Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Faecal immunochemical test for patients with 'high-risk' bowel symptoms: a large prospective cohort study and updated literature review.
Laszlo, Helga E; Seward, Edward; Ayling, Ruth M; Lake, Jennifer; Malhi, Aman; Stephens, Clare; Pritchard-Jones, Kathy; Chung, Donna; Hackshaw, Allan; Machesney, Michael.
Afiliación
  • Laszlo HE; North Central London Cancer Alliance, 47 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8SE, UK. helga.laszlo@nhs.net.
  • Seward E; North Central London Cancer Alliance, 47 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8SE, UK.
  • Ayling RM; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
  • Lake J; Barts Health NHS Trust-The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK.
  • Malhi A; Barts Health NHS Trust-The Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1BB, UK.
  • Stephens C; Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 4TJ, UK.
  • Pritchard-Jones K; North Central London Cancer Alliance, 47 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8SE, UK.
  • Chung D; North London Partners in Health and Care, 5 Pancras Square, London, N1C 4AG, UK.
  • Hackshaw A; North Central London Cancer Alliance, 47 Wimpole Street, London, W1G 8SE, UK.
  • Machesney M; University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Br J Cancer ; 126(5): 736-743, 2022 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903843
BACKGROUND: We evaluated whether faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) can rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) among patients presenting with 'high-risk' symptoms requiring definitive investigation. METHODS: Three thousand five hundred and ninety-six symptomatic patients referred to the standard urgent CRC pathway were recruited in a multi-centre observational study. They completed FIT in addition to standard investigations. CRC miss rate (percentage of CRC cases with low quantitative faecal haemoglobin [f-Hb] measurement) and specificity (percentage of patients without cancer with low f-Hb) were calculated. We also provided an updated literature review. RESULTS: Ninety patients had CRC. At f-Hb < 10 µg/g, the miss rate was 16.7% (specificity 80.1%). At f-Hb < 4 µg/g, the miss rate was 12.2% (specificity 73%), which became 3.3% if low FIT plus the absence of anaemia and abdominal pain were considered (specificity 51%). Within meta-analyses of 9 UK studies, the pooled miss rate was 7.2% (specificity 74%) for f-Hb < 4 µg/g. DISCUSSION: FIT alone as a triage tool would miss an estimated 1 in 8 cases in our study (1 in 14 from meta-analysis), while many people without CRC could avoid investigations. FIT can focus secondary care diagnostic capacity on patients most at risk of CRC, but more work on safety netting is required before incorporating FIT triage into the urgent diagnostic pathway.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemoglobinas / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Heces Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Hemoglobinas / Neoplasias Colorrectales / Heces Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Br J Cancer Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article