Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of calcium ammonium nitrate fed to dairy cows on nutrient intake and digestibility, milk quality, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal fermentation parameters.
Almeida, K V; Santos, G T; Daniel, J L P; Osorio, J A C; Yamada, K L G; Sippert, M R; Cabral, J F; Marchi, F E; Araujo, R C; Vyas, D.
Afiliación
  • Almeida KV; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900; Department of Agriculture, Nutrition, and Food Systems, University of New Hampshire, Durham 03824.
  • Santos GT; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Daniel JLP; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Osorio JAC; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Yamada KLG; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Sippert MR; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Cabral JF; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Marchi FE; Department of Animal Sciences, State University of Maringa, Maringa, Brazil 87020-900.
  • Araujo RC; GRASP Ind. & Com. Ltda., Curitiba, Brazil 81260-000.
  • Vyas D; Department of Animal Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville 32611. Electronic address: diwakarvyas@ufl.edu.
J Dairy Sci ; 105(3): 2228-2241, 2022 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34998571
We evaluated the effects of supplemental calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) fed to dairy cows on dry matter (DM) intake, nutrient digestibility, milk quality, microbial protein synthesis, and ruminal fermentation. Six multiparous Holstein cows at 106 ± 14.8 d in milk, with 551 ± 21.8 kg of body weight were used in a replicated 3 × 3 Latin square design. Experimental period lasted 21 d, with 14 d for an adaptation phase and 7 d for sampling and data collection. Cows were randomly assigned to receive the following treatments: URE, 12 g of urea/kg of DM as a control group; CAN15, 15 g of CAN/kg of DM; and CAN30, 30 g of CAN/kg of DM. Supplemental CAN reduced DM intake (URE 19.0 vs. CAN15 18.9 vs. CAN30 16.5 kg/d). No treatment effects were observed for apparent digestibility of DM, organic matter, crude protein, ether extract, and neutral detergent fiber; however, CAN supplementation linearly increased nonfiber carbohydrate digestibility. Milk yield was not affected by treatments (average = 23.1 kg/d), whereas energy-corrected milk (ECM) and 3.5% fat-corrected milk (FCM) decreased as the levels of CAN increased. Nitrate residue in milk increased linearly (URE 0.30 vs. CAN15 0.33 vs. CAN30 0.38 mg/L); however, treatments did not affect nitrite concentration (average: 0.042 mg/L). Milk fat concentration was decreased (URE 3.39 vs. CAN15 3.35 vs. CAN30 2.94%), and the proportion of saturated fatty acids was suppressed by CAN supplementation. No treatment effects were observed on the reducing power and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances of milk, whereas conjugated dienes increased linearly (URE 47.6 vs. CAN15 52.7 vs. CAN30 63.4 mmol/g of fat) with CAN supplementation. Treatments had no effect on microbial protein synthesis; however, molar proportion of ruminal acetate and acetate-to-propionate ratio increased with CAN supplementation. Based on the results observed, supplementing CAN at 30 g/kg of DM should not be recommended as an optimal dose because it lowered DM intake along with ECM and 3.5% FCM, although no major changes were observed on milk quality and ruminal fermentation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Leche / Nitratos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Leche / Nitratos Límite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: J Dairy Sci Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article