Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A feasibility randomised controlled trial of targeted oxygen therapy in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients.
Martin, Daniel S; McNeil, Margaret; Brew-Graves, Chris; Filipe, Helder; O'Driscoll, Ronan; Stevens, Jia Liu; Burnish, Rachel; Cumpstey, Andrew F; Williams, Norman R; Mythen, Michael G; Grocott, Michael Pw.
Afiliación
  • Martin DS; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK.
  • McNeil M; Peninsula Medical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.
  • Brew-Graves C; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Filipe H; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK.
  • O'Driscoll R; Division of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
  • Stevens JL; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK.
  • Burnish R; Respiratory Medicine, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
  • Cumpstey AF; Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Williams NR; Intensive Care Unit, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London, UK.
  • Mythen MG; Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
  • Grocott MP; Acute Perioperative and Critical Care Research Theme, Southampton NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton/University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
J Intensive Care Soc ; 22(4): 280-287, 2021 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35154365
BACKGROUND: Despite oxygen being the commonest drug administered to critically ill patients we do not know which oxygen saturation (SpO2) target results in optimal survival outcomes in those receiving mechanical ventilation. We therefore conducted a feasibility randomised controlled trial in the United Kingdom (UK) to assess whether it would be possible to host a larger national multi-centre trial to evaluate oxygenation targets in mechanically ventilated patients. METHODS: We set out to recruit 60 participants across two sites into a trial in which they were randomised to receive conservative oxygenation (SpO2 88-92%) or usual care (control - SpO2 ≥96%). The primary outcome was feasibility; factors related to safety and clinical outcomes were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were recruited into the study until it was stopped due to time constraints. A number of key barriers to success were identified during the course of the study. The conservative oxygenation intervention was feasible and appeared to be safe in this small patient cohort and it achieved wide separation of the median time-weighted average (IQR) SpO2 at 91% (90-92%) in conservative oxygenation group versus 97% (96-97%) in control group. CONCLUSION: Whilst conservative oxygenation was a feasible and safe intervention which achieved clear group separation in oxygenation levels, the model used in this trial will require alterations to improve future participant recruitment rates in the UK.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Soc Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Intensive Care Soc Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article