Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Optimization of GFAG crystal surface treatment for SiPM based TOF PET detector.
Kang, Han Gyu; Kim, Kyoung Jin; Kamada, Kei; Yoshikawa, Akira; Yoshida, Eiji; Nishikido, Fumihiko; Yamaya, Taiga.
Afiliación
  • Kang HG; National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology (QST), 4-9-1, Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba, Japan.
  • Kim KJ; C&A Corporation, 6-6-10, Aoba, Aramaki, Sendai 980-8579, Japan.
  • Kamada K; Institute for Materials Research (IMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1, Katahira, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.
  • Yoshikawa A; C&A Corporation, 6-6-10, Aoba, Aramaki, Sendai 980-8579, Japan.
  • Yoshida E; Institute for Materials Research (IMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1, Katahira, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.
  • Nishikido F; C&A Corporation, 6-6-10, Aoba, Aramaki, Sendai 980-8579, Japan.
  • Yamaya T; Institute for Materials Research (IMR), Tohoku University, 2-1-1, Katahira, Sendai 980-8577, Japan.
Biomed Phys Eng Express ; 8(2)2022 02 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35180713
ABSTRACT
Coincidence timing resolution (CTR) is an important parameter in clinical positron emission tomography (PET) scanners to increase the signal-to-noise ratio of PET images by using time-of-flight (TOF) information. Lutetium (Lu) based scintillators are often used for TOF-PET systems. However, the self-radiation of Lu-based scintillators may influence the image quality for ultra-low activity PET imaging. Recently, a gadolinium fine aluminum gallate (CeGFAG) scintillation crystal that features a fast decay time (∼55 ns) and no self-radiation was developed. The present study aimed at optimizing the GFAG crystal surface treatment to enhance both CTR and energy resolution (ER). The TOF-PET detector consisted of a GFAG crystal (3.0 × 3.0 × 20 mm3) and a SiPM with an effective area of 3.0 × 3.0 mm2. The timing and energy signals were extracted using a high-frequency SiPM readout circuit and then were digitized using a CAMAC DAQ system. The CTR and ER were evaluated with nine different crystal surface treatments such as partial saw-cut and chemical polishing and the 1-side saw-cut was the best choice among the treatments. The respective CTR and ER of 202 ± 2 ps and 9.5 ± 0.1% were obtained with the 1-side saw-cut; the other 5-side mechanically polished GFAG crystals had respective values which were 18 ps (9.0%) and 1.3% better than those of the all-side mechanically polished GFAG crystal. The chemically polished GFAG crystals also offered enhanced CTR and ER of about 17 ps (8.2%) and 2.1%, respectively, over the mechanically polished GFAG crystals.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fotones / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Phys Eng Express Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fotones / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Idioma: En Revista: Biomed Phys Eng Express Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Japón