Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biological augmentation of meniscal repair: a systematic review.
Keller, Rachel E; O'Donnell, Evan A; Medina, Giovanna I S; Linderman, Shannon E; Cheng, Timothy T W; Sabbag, Orlando D; Oh, Luke S.
Afiliación
  • Keller RE; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA. keller.rachel94@gmail.com.
  • O'Donnell EA; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Medina GIS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Linderman SE; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Cheng TTW; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Sabbag OD; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
  • Oh LS; Department of Orthopedic Surgery-Sports Medicine Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, 175 Cambridge St, Suite 400, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 30(6): 1915-1926, 2022 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35258647
PURPOSE: Orthopedic literature remains divided on the utility of biologic augmentation to optimize outcomes after isolated meniscal repair. The aim of this systematic review is to analyze the clinical outcomes and re-operation rates of biologically augmented meniscal repairs. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases were queried in October 2020 for published literature on isolated meniscal repair with biological augmentation. Studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias by two appraisal tools. Patient demographics, meniscal tear characteristics, surgical procedure, augmentation type, post-operative rehabilitation, patient reported outcome measures, and length of follow-up were recorded, reviewed, and analyzed by two independent reviewers. RESULTS: Of 3794 articles, 18 met inclusion criteria and yielded 537 patients who underwent biologic augmentation of meniscal repair. The biologically augmented repair rates were 5.8-27.0% with PRP augmentation, 0.0-28.5% with fibrin clot augmentation, 0.0-12.9% with marrow stimulation, and 0.0% with stem cell augmentation. One of seven studies showed lower revision rates with augmented meniscal repair compared to standard repair techniques, whereas five of seven found no benefit. Three of ten studies found significant functional improvement of biologically augmented repair versus standard repair techniques and six of ten studies found no difference. There was significant heterogeneity in methods for biologic preparation, delivery, and post-operative rehabilitation protocols. CONCLUSION: Patients reported significant improvements in functional outcomes scores after repair with biological augmentation, though the benefit over standard repair controls is questionable. Revision rates after biologically augmented meniscal repair also appear similar to standard repair techniques. Clinicians should bear this in mind when considering biologic augmentation in the setting of meniscal repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Lesiones de Menisco Tibial / Traumatismos de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Productos Biológicos / Lesiones de Menisco Tibial / Traumatismos de la Rodilla Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA ESPORTIVA / TRAUMATOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos