Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prognostic models to predict survival in patients with pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.
Ioannou, Liane J; Maharaj, Ashika D; Zalcberg, John R; Loughnan, Jesse T; Croagh, Daniel G; Pilgrim, Charles H; Goldstein, David; Kench, James G; Merrett, Neil D; Earnest, Arul; Burmeister, Elizabeth A; White, Kate; Neale, Rachel E; Evans, Sue M.
Afiliación
  • Ioannou LJ; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia. Electronic address: liane.ioannou@monash.edu.
  • Maharaj AD; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Zalcberg JR; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Loughnan JT; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Croagh DG; Department of Surgery, Monash Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Pilgrim CH; Department of Surgery, Alfred Health, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Goldstein D; Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Medicine, NSW, Australia.
  • Kench JG; Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; Central Clinical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Merrett ND; School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, NSW, Australia.
  • Earnest A; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Burmeister EA; Cancer Care Services, Fraser Coast and University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
  • White K; Sydney Nursing School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Neale RE; QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
  • Evans SM; Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
HPB (Oxford) ; 24(8): 1201-1216, 2022 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35289282
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has poor survival. Current treatments offer little likelihood of cure or long-term survival. This systematic review evaluates prognostic models predicting overall survival in patients diagnosed with PDAC.

METHODS:

We conducted a comprehensive search of eight electronic databases from their date of inception through to December 2019. Studies that published models predicting survival in patients with PDAC were identified.

RESULTS:

3297 studies were identified; 187 full-text articles were retrieved and 54 studies of 49 unique prognostic models were included. Of these, 28 (57.1%) were conducted in patients with advanced disease, 17 (34.7%) with resectable disease, and four (8.2%) in all patients. 34 (69.4%) models were validated, and 35 (71.4%) reported model discrimination, with only five models reporting values >0.70 in both derivation and validation cohorts. Many (n = 27) had a moderate to high risk of bias and most (n = 33) were developed using retrospective data. No variables were unanimously found to be predictive of survival when included in more than one study.

CONCLUSION:

Most prognostic models were developed using retrospective data and performed poorly. Future research should validate instruments performing well locally in international cohorts and investigate other potential predictors of survival.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: HPB (Oxford) Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article