Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Postextubation Stridor in Severe COVID-19.
Abdallah, Georges Abi; Ferré, Alexis; Gros, Antoine; Simon, Christelle; Bruneel, Fabrice; Marque-Juillet, Stéphanie; Legriel, Stéphane; Paul, Marine.
Afiliación
  • Abdallah GA; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Ferré A; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Gros A; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Simon C; Anaesthesia Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Bruneel F; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Marque-Juillet S; Microbiology Department, Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France.
  • Legriel S; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France; and University Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, INSERM, CESP, PsyDev Team, Villejuif, France.
  • Paul M; Medical-Surgical Intensive Care Department Centre Hospitalier de Versailles - Site Andre Mignot, Le Chesnay, France. mpaul@ch-versailles.fr.
Respir Care ; 67(6): 638-646, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35318237
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, 60-80% of patients admitted to ICU require mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress. We aimed to compare the frequency of postextubation stridor (PES) and to explore risk factors in COVID-19 subjects compared to those without COVID-19.

METHODS:

We performed an observational retrospective study on subjects admitted for severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation > 48 h during the first and second waves in 2020 and compared these subjects to historical controls without COVID-19 who received mechanical ventilation > 48 h between 2016-2019. The primary outcome was the frequency of PES, defined as audible stridor within 2 h following extubation.

RESULTS:

Of the 134 subjects admitted with severe COVID-19 requiring mechanical ventilation, 96 were extubated and included and compared to 211 controls. The frequency of PES was 22.9% in the COVID-19 subjects and 3.8% in the controls (P < .001). Factors independently associated with PES were having COVID-19 (odds ratio 3.72, [95% CI 1.24-12.14], P = .02), female sex (odds ratio 5.77 [95% CI 2.30-15.64], P < .001), and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning (odds ratio 3.01 [95% CI 1.04-9.44], P = .047) after adjustment on Simplified Acute Physiology Score II expanded). During the first wave, PES was significantly more common in subjects with a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test on tracheal samples on the day of extubation (73.3% vs 24.3%, P = .018).

CONCLUSIONS:

PES affected nearly one-quarter of subjects with COVID-19, a proportion significantly higher than that seen in controls. Independent risk factors for PES were COVID-19, female sex, and tube mobilization or re-intubation or prone positioning. PES was associated with persistent viral shedding at the time of extubation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ruidos Respiratorios / COVID-19 / Intubación Intratraqueal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ruidos Respiratorios / COVID-19 / Intubación Intratraqueal Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Respir Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia