Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Delivering Positive Newborn Screening Results: Cost Analysis of Existing Practice versus Innovative, Co-Designed Strategies from the ReSPoND Study.
Fusco, Francesco; Chudleigh, Jane; Holder, Pru; Bonham, James R; Southern, Kevin W; Simpson, Alan; Moody, Louise; Olander, Ellinor K; Chinnery, Holly; Morris, Stephen.
Afiliación
  • Fusco F; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
  • Chudleigh J; Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
  • Holder P; Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
  • Bonham JR; Pharmacy, Diagnostics and Genetics Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield S10 2TH, UK.
  • Southern KW; Women's and Children's Health, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK.
  • Simpson A; Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King's College London, London SE1 8WA, UK.
  • Moody L; Centre for Arts, Memory and Communities, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
  • Olander EK; Centre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK.
  • Chinnery H; Faculty of Sports, Health and Applied Science, St Mary's University Twickenham, Twickenham TW1 4SX, UK.
  • Morris S; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0SR, UK.
Int J Neonatal Screen ; 8(1)2022 Mar 14.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35323198
ABSTRACT
Although the communication pathways of Newborn Bloodspot Screening (NBS) are a delicate task, these pathways vary across different conditions and are often not evidence-based. The ReSPoND interventions were co-designed by healthcare professionals alongside parents who had received a positive NBS result for their child. To calculate the cost of these co-designed strategies and the existing communication pathways, we interviewed 71 members of the clinical and laboratory staff of the 13 English NBS laboratories in the English National Health Service. Therefore, a scenario analysis was used to compare the cost of the existing communication pathways to the co-designed strategies delivered by (i) home-visits and (ii) telecommunications. On average, the existing communication pathway cost £447.08 per infant (range £237.12 to £628.51) or £234,872.75 (£3635.99 to £1,932,986.23) nationally. Implementing the new interventions relying on home-visits exclusively would cost on average £521.62 (£312.84 to £646.39) per infant and £297,816.03 (£4506.37 to £2,550,284.64) nationally, or £447.19 (£235.79 to £552.03) and £231,342.40 (£3923.7 to £1,922,192.22) if implemented via teleconsultations, respectively. The new strategies delivered are not likely to require additional resources compared with current practice. Further research is needed to investigate whether this investment represents good value for money for the NHS budget.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neonatal Screen Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation / Screening_studies Idioma: En Revista: Int J Neonatal Screen Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido