Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Norms, rules and policy tools: understanding Article 5.3 as an instrument of tobacco control governance.
Ralston, Rob; Hirpa, Selamawit; Bassi, Shalini; Male, Denis; Kumar, Praveen; Barry, Rachel Ann; Collin, Jeff.
Afiliación
  • Ralston R; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK Rob.Ralston@ed.ac.uk.
  • Hirpa S; SPECTRUM Consortium (Shaping Public Health Policies to Reduce Inequalities and Harm), London, UK.
  • Bassi S; Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Male D; HRIDAY, Delhi, India.
  • Kumar P; School of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
  • Barry RA; Department of Commerce, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
  • Collin J; Global Health Policy Unit, Social Policy, School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Tob Control ; 31(Suppl 1): s53-s60, 2022 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35393367
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Article 5.3 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, elaborated via its implementation guidelines, can be understood as a policy instrument comprising norms, rules and policy tools designed to shape practices of policy making and minimise tobacco industry interference.

METHODS:

This qualitative research is based on in-depth interviews with officials from diverse government sectors and non-governmental organisations across countries (Ethiopia, India, Uganda) that have adopted measures to implement Article 5.3.

RESULTS:

The data highlight varied perceptions and knowledge of Article 5.3 norms between health and non-health sectors. Health officials typically link its core norm of a fundamental conflict between public health and industry interests to the governance norm of protecting public health policies from industry interference. While officials in sectors beyond health broadly endorsed this core norm, they exhibited more limited awareness of Article 5.3 and its model of governance. The results examine how rules to implement Article 5.3 have been codified, but identify the absence of policy tools necessary to operationalise rules and norms. This limitation, alongside restricted awareness beyond health departments, suggests that political commitments to implement Article 5.3 will have limited impact on practices of stakeholder consultation and policy engagement with the tobacco industry.

CONCLUSION:

Conceptualising Article 5.3 as a policy instrument helps to explain how its rules and policy tools interact with each other and with broader governance processes. This framework has the potential to enhance understanding of Article 5.3 and help identify opportunities and constraints in its implementation.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nicotiana / Industria del Tabaco Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Nicotiana / Industria del Tabaco Tipo de estudio: Guideline / Qualitative_research Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Tob Control Asunto de la revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Reino Unido