Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Investigating the potential of a novel internet-based cognitive behavioural intervention for Dari and Farsi speaking refugee youth: A feasibility study.
Lindegaard, Tomas; Wasteson, Elisabet; Demetry, Youstina; Andersson, Gerhard; Richards, Derek; Shahnavaz, Shervin.
Afiliación
  • Lindegaard T; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Wasteson E; Department of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, Sweden.
  • Demetry Y; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
  • Andersson G; Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, The Centre for Psychotherapy, Education & Research, Sweden.
  • Richards D; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
  • Shahnavaz S; Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Internet Interv ; 28: 100533, 2022 Apr.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35433279
ABSTRACT

Objective:

Over half of the world's forcibly displaced persons are under the age of 25, with many suffering from symptoms of psychological disorders. Many refugees from Afghanistan or Iran speak either Dari or Farsi, which are mutually intelligible dialects of the Persian language. Previous research on adult refugees and immigrants have shown that internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT) can be a valuable complement to other forms of treatment. However, there is a lack of knowledge if ICBT is a feasible and acceptable treatment for adolescents and young adults with a refugee background.

Method:

Fifteen Dari/Farsi-speaking adolescents and young adults between 15 and 26 years of age participated in a feasibility study of a novel individually tailored guided ICBT intervention targeting symptoms of common mental disorders such as anxiety and depression. Self-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) as the primary outcome measure. Four of the treatment participants and three additional non-treatment participants consented to be interviewed regarding the programme's acceptability. The interviews were analysed using Thematic Analysis.

Results:

The intervention suffered from low adherence, with only 3 participants completing the post-treatment assessment and with participants completing 0.9 modules on average, which meant that the intended quantitative analysis of the pre to post change was not possible. The thematic analysis resulted in two overarching categories, barriers and facilitators, that each contained four themes and related subthemes. Overall, the intervention was deemed culturally relevant and easy to understand. The most salient barriers to participation across interviews concerned interference of symptoms such as concentration difficulties, low energy, and a lack of human contact and support.

Conclusion:

The current version of the ICBT program demonstrated low feasibility and acceptability in the target population, which mainly seemed to be related to the delivery format. Future studies should investigate if a blended treatment format with regular phone/video calls with a therapist can increase adherence to the intervention.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Internet Interv Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Qualitative_research Idioma: En Revista: Internet Interv Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia