Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Accuracy of a Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitor in Individuals With Diabetes on Hemodialysis.
Villard, Orianne; Breton, Marc D; Rao, Swati; Voelmle, Mary K; Fuller, Morgan R; Myers, Helen E; McFadden, Ryan K; Luke, Zander S; Wakeman, Christian A; Clancy-Oliveri, Mary; Basu, Ananda; Stumpf, Meaghan M.
Afiliación
  • Villard O; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Breton MD; Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
  • Rao S; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Voelmle MK; Division of Transplant Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Fuller MR; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Myers HE; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • McFadden RK; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Luke ZS; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Wakeman CA; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Clancy-Oliveri M; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Basu A; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
  • Stumpf MM; Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
Diabetes Care ; 45(7): 1666-1669, 2022 07 07.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35485908
OBJECTIVE: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) improves diabetes management, but its reliability in individuals on hemodialysis is poorly understood and potentially affected by interstitial and intravascular volume variations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We assessed the accuracy of a factory-calibrated CGM by using venous blood glucose measurements (vBGM) during hemodialysis sessions and self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) at home. RESULTS: Twenty participants completed the protocol. The mean absolute relative difference of the CGM was 13.8% and 14.4%, when calculated on SMBG (n = 684) and on vBGM (n = 624), and 98.7% and 100% of values in the Parkes error grid A/B zones, respectively. Throughout 181 days of CGM monitoring, the median time in range (70-180 mg/dL) was 38.5% (interquartile range 29.3-57.9), with 28.7% (7.8-40.6) of the time >250 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of a factory-calibrated CGM appears reasonably accurate and clinically relevant for use in practice by individuals on hemodialysis and health professionals to improve diabetes management.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Glucemia / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Diabetes Care Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article