Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of intravenous lidocaine on pain after head and neck cancer surgery (ELICO trial): A randomised controlled trial.
Wallon, Grégoire; Erbacher, Julien; Omar, Edris; Bauer, Christian; Axiotis, Grégory; Thevenon, Sylvie; Soubirou, Jean-Luc; Aubrun, Frédéric.
Afiliación
  • Wallon G; From the Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, Centre Léon Bérard (GW, JE, GA, JLS), Département d'anesthésie-réanimation, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon (EO, CB, FA), Centre de recherche clinique, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon (ST), and Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), U1290, INSERM et Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France (FA).
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 39(9): 735-742, 2022 09 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35852564
BACKGROUND: Treatment of postoperative pain after ear, nose and throat (ENT) cancer surgery is mainly morphine administration. Additional systemic lidocaine has shown promising results in some surgical procedures. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate morphine consumption in the first 48 postoperative hours after intra-operative lidocaine infusion during major ENT cancer surgery. DESIGN: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Bicentric study including a university hospital and a major cancer centre, conducted from December 2016 to December 2019. PATIENTS: A total of 144 patients undergoing major ENT cancer surgery were included. INTERVENTION: The patients were randomly assigned to receive intravenous lidocaine or placebo during surgery and in the recovery room. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Endpoints were postoperative morphine consumption in the first 24 and 48 h postoperatively, intra-operative remifentanil consumption, adverse events occurrence and assessment 3 to 6 months after surgery with the McGill pain questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included (lidocaine n  = 57; placebo n  = 61, 26 patients were excluded). There was no significant difference in morphine consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours in the lidocaine group compared with the placebo group with a median [IQR] of 0.60 [0.30 to 1.03] mg kg -1 vs. 0.57 [0.37 to 0.96] mg kg -1 , total dose 44 [21 to 73.3] mg vs. 38 [23.3 to 56.5] mg, P  = 0.92.There was no significant difference between the two groups in any of the other endpoints, including at follow up 3 to 6 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: Intravenous lidocaine in ENT cancer surgery did not show any additional analgesic or morphine-sparing effect 48 h after surgery. Three to six months after surgery, there was no significant difference in pain scores or consumption of analgesics. Patients treated pre-operatively with opioids were not evaluated in the study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02894710 and EUDRACT number 2015-005799-90.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Lidocaína Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Anaesthesiol Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello / Lidocaína Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Anaesthesiol Asunto de la revista: ANESTESIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article