Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN).
Degiuli, Maurizio; Ortenzi, Monica; Tomatis, Mariano; Puca, Lucia; Cianflocca, Desiree; Rega, Daniela; Maroli, Annalisa; Elmore, Ugo; Pecchini, Francesca; Milone, Marco; La Mendola, Roberta; Soligo, Erica; Deidda, Simona; Spoletini, Domenico; Cassini, Diletta; Aprile, Alessandra; Mineccia, Michela; Nikaj, Herald; Marchegiani, Francesco; Maiello, Fabio; Bombardini, Cristina; Zuolo, Michele; Carlucci, Michele; Ferraro, Luca; Falato, Armando; Biondi, Alberto; Persiani, Roberto; Marsanich, Patrizia; Fusario, Daniele; Solaini, Leonardo; Pollesel, Sara; Rizzo, Gianluca; Coco, Claudio; Di Leo, Alberto; Cavaliere, Davide; Roviello, Franco; Muratore, Andrea; D'Ugo, Domenico; Bianco, Francesco; Bianchi, Paolo Pietro; De Nardi, Paola; Rigamonti, Marco; Anania, Gabriele; Belluco, Claudio; Polastri, Roberto; Pucciarelli, Salvatore; Gentilli, Sergio; Ferrero, Alessandro; Scabini, Stefano; Baldazzi, Gianandrea.
Afiliación
  • Degiuli M; University of Turin, Department of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, Div of Surgical Oncology, Orbassano, Turin, Italy. maurizio.degiuli@unito.it.
  • Ortenzi M; Department of Oncology, Head Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, University of Torino, San Luigi University Hospital, Regione Gonzole 10 Orbassano, 10043, Turin, Italy. maurizio.degiuli@unito.it.
  • Tomatis M; Clinica Chirurgica Universita' Politecnica delle Marche, Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona, Italy.
  • Puca L; BSIT, Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Cianflocca D; University of Turin, Department of Oncology, San Luigi University Hospital, Div of Surgical Oncology, Orbassano, Turin, Italy.
  • Rega D; Department of Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy.
  • Maroli A; Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
  • Elmore U; Colorectal Surgical Oncology, Abdominal Oncology Department, Fondazione Giovanni Pascale IRCCS, Naples, Italy.
  • Pecchini F; Colon and Rectal Surgery Division, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Via Alessandro Manzoni, 56, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.
  • Milone M; Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Vita Salute University, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
  • La Mendola R; Unita' Operativa di chirurgia generale, d'urgenza e nuove tecnologie, OCSAE, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Modena, Modena, Italy.
  • Soligo E; Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Department of Gastroenterology, Endocrinology and Endoscopic Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
  • Deidda S; General Surgery Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Rovigo, Italy.
  • Spoletini D; S.C. Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Andrea, Vercelli, Italy.
  • Cassini D; Chirurgia Coloproctologica-AOU Cagliari, Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università di Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Aprile A; UOC Chirurgia Generale, Ospedale S. Eugenio, Piazzale dell'Umanesimo, 10, 00144, Rome, Italy.
  • Mineccia M; Unità Operativa Complessa di Chirurgia Generale, P.O. SSG, ASST NORD MILANO, Milan, Italy.
  • Nikaj H; Surgical Oncology Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.
  • Marchegiani F; Department of General and Oncological Surgery, "Umberto I" Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy.
  • Maiello F; SCDU Clinica Chirurgica, General Surgery Department, AOU "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy.
  • Bombardini C; Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Zuolo M; Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy.
  • Carlucci M; Department of Surgical Morphology and Experimental Medicine, AOU Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Ferraro L; General Surgery Division, "Valli del Noce" Hospital, Cles, Provincial Agency for Health Services (APSS), Trento, Italy.
  • Falato A; Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, 20132, Milan, Italy.
  • Biondi A; Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142, Milan, Italy.
  • Persiani R; General Surgery Unit, San Leonardo Hospital, ASL-NA3sud, Castellammare di Stabbia, Naples, Italy.
  • Marsanich P; Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy.
  • Fusario D; Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy.
  • Solaini L; Surgical Department, Edoardo Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, Italy.
  • Pollesel S; UOC General and Oncological Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Rizzo G; General and Oncologic Surgery, Morgagni-Pierantoni Hospital, Ausl Romagna, Forlì, Italy.
  • Coco C; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy.
  • Di Leo A; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy.
  • Cavaliere D; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy.
  • Roviello F; UOC di Chirurgia, Ospedale "San Camillo", Trento, Italy.
  • Muratore A; Department of Surgical Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
  • D'Ugo D; Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Chirurgia Generale Presidio Columbus, Rome, Italy.
  • Bianco F; Surgical Department, Edoardo Agnelli Hospital, Pinerolo, Italy.
  • Bianchi PP; Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli, IRCCS, AREA di Chirurgia Addominale, Rome, Italy.
  • De Nardi P; General Surgery Unit, San Leonardo Hospital, ASL-NA3sud, Castellammare di Stabbia, Naples, Italy.
  • Rigamonti M; Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142, Milan, Italy.
  • Anania G; Department of Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy.
  • Belluco C; Division of General and Robotic Surgery, Dipartimento di Scienze della Salute, Università di Milano, 20142, Milan, Italy.
  • Polastri R; General Surgery Division, "Valli del Noce" Hospital, Cles, Provincial Agency for Health Services (APSS), Trento, Italy.
  • Pucciarelli S; Department of Surgical Morphology and Experimental Medicine, AOU Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Gentilli S; Department of Surgical Oncology, CRO Aviano, National Cancer Institute, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
  • Ferrero A; Department of Surgery, General Surgery Unit, Hospital of Biella, Biella, Italy.
  • Scabini S; Department of Surgical, Oncological, and Gastroenterological Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
  • Baldazzi G; SCDU Clinica Chirurgica, General Surgery Department, AOU "Maggiore Della Carità" Hospital, Novara, Italy.
Surg Endosc ; 37(2): 977-988, 2023 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36085382
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) segmental resection of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) is not available, mostly due to the rarity of this tumor. This study aimed to determine the survival outcomes of MI and open treatment, and to investigate whether MI is noninferior to open procedure regarding short-term outcomes.

METHODS:

This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all consecutive SFC segmental resections performed in 30 referral centers between 2006 and 2016. The primary endpoint assessing efficacy was the overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence rate (RR), short-term clinical outcomes (a composite of Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications and 30-day mortality), and pathological outcomes (a composite of lymph nodes removed ≧12, and proximal and distal free resection margins length ≧ 5 cm). For these composites, a 6% noninferiority margin was chosen based on clinical relevance estimate.

RESULTS:

A total of 606 patients underwent either an open (208, 34.3%) or a MI (398, 65.7%) SFC segmental resection. At univariable analysis, OS and CSM were improved in the MI group (log-rank test p = 0.004 and Gray's tests p = 0.004, respectively), while recurrences were comparable (Gray's tests p = 0.434). Cox multivariable analysis did not support that OS and CSM were better in the MI group (p = 0.109 and p = 0.163, respectively). Successful pathological outcome, observed in 53.2% of open and 58.3% of MI resections, supported noninferiority (difference 5.1%; 1-sided 95%CI - 4.7% to ∞). Successful short-term clinical outcome was documented in 93.3% of Open and 93.0% of MI procedures, and supported noninferiority as well (difference - 0.3%; 1-sided 95%CI - 5.0% to ∞).

CONCLUSIONS:

Among patients with SFC, the minimally invasive approach met the criterion for noninferiority for postoperative complications and pathological outcomes, and was found to provide results of OS, CSM, and RR comparable to those of open resection.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Neoplasias del Colon / Colon Transverso / Oncología Quirúrgica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Laparoscopía / Neoplasias del Colon / Colon Transverso / Oncología Quirúrgica Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia