Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric Performance of a Condition-Specific Quality-of-Life Instrument for Dutch Children Born with Esophageal Atresia.
Ten Kate, Chantal A; IJsselstijn, Hanneke; Dellenmark-Blom, Michaela; van Tuyll van Serooskerken, E Sofie; Joosten, Maja; Wijnen, René M H; van Wijk, Michiel P.
Afiliación
  • Ten Kate CA; Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • IJsselstijn H; Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Dellenmark-Blom M; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 41650 Gothenburg, Sweden.
  • van Tuyll van Serooskerken ES; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 EA Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Joosten M; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Amalia Children's Hospital, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • Wijnen RMH; Department of Pediatric Surgery and Intensive Care Children, Erasmus University Medical Centre-Sophia Children's Hospital, 3015 CN Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Wijk MP; Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Amsterdam UMC-Emma Children's Hospital, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Children (Basel) ; 9(10)2022 Oct 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36291444
A condition-specific instrument (EA-QOL©) to assess quality of life of children born with esophageal atresia (EA) was developed in Sweden and Germany. Before implementing this in the Netherlands, we evaluated its psychometric performance in Dutch children. After Swedish−Dutch translation, cognitive debriefing was conducted with a subset of EA patients and their parents. Next, feasibility, reliability, and validity were evaluated in a nationwide field test. Cognitive debriefing confirmed the predefined concepts, although some questions were not generally applicable. Feasibility was poor to moderate. In 2-to-7-year-old children, 8/17 items had >5% missing values. In 8-to-17-year-old children, this concerned 3/24 items of the proxy-report and 5/14 items of the self-report. The internal reliability was good. The retest reliability showed good correlation. The comparison reliability between self-reports and proxy-reports was strong. The construct validity was discriminative. The convergent validity was strong for the 2-to-7-year-old proxy-report, and weak to moderate for the 8-to-17-year-old proxy-report and self-report. In conclusion, the Dutch-translated EA-QOL questionnaires showed good reliability and validity. Feasibility was likely affected by items not deemed applicable to an individual child's situation. Computer adaptive testing could be a potential solution to customizing the questionnaire to the individual patient. Furthermore, cross-cultural validation studies and implementation-evaluation studies in different countries are needed.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Children (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Children (Basel) Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos