Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The application of an age adjusted D-dimer threshold to rule out suspected venous thromboembolism (VTE) in an emergency department setting: a retrospective diagnostic cohort study.
Barrett, Liam; Jones, Tom; Horner, Daniel.
Afiliación
  • Barrett L; Emergency Department, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, CB2 0QQ, UK. lb893@cam.ac.uk.
  • Jones T; University Division of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK. lb893@cam.ac.uk.
  • Horner D; Wythenshawe Hospital, University of Hospital of South Manchester, Southmoor Road, Wythenshawe, M23 9LT, UK.
BMC Emerg Med ; 22(1): 186, 2022 11 23.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36418964
BACKGROUND: Venous Thromboembolic disease (VTE) poses a diagnostic challenge for clinicians in acute care. Over reliance on reference standard investigations can lead to over treatment and potential harm. We sought to evaluate the pragmatic performance and implications of using an age adjusted D-dimer (AADD) strategy to rule out VTE in patients with suspected disease attending an emergency department (ED) setting. We aimed to determine diagnostic test characteristics and assess whether this strategy would result in proportional imaging reduction and potential cost savings. METHODS: Design: Single centre retrospective diagnostic cohort study. All patients > 50 years old evaluated for possible VTE who presented to the emergency department over a consecutive 12-month period between January and December 2016 with a positive D-dimer result. Clinical assessment records and reference standard imaging results were followed up by multiple independent adjudicators and coded as VTE positive or negative. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 2132 positive D-dimer results. One thousand two hundred thirty-six patients received reference standard investigations. A total increase of 314/1236 (25.1%) results would have been coded as true negatives as opposed to false positive if the AADD cut off point had been applied, with 314 reference standard tests subsequently avoided. The AADD cut off had comparable sensitivity to the current cut off despite this increase in specificity; sensitivities for the diagnosis of DVT were 99.28% (95% CI 96.06-99.98%) and 97.72% for PE (95% CI 91.94% to 97.72). There were 3 false negative results using the AADD strategy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with suspected VTE with a low or moderate pre-test probability, the application of AADD appears to increase the proportion of patients in which VTE can be excluded without the need for reference standard imaging. This management strategy is likely to be associated with substantial reduction in anticoagulation treatment, investigations and cost/time savings.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Tromboembolia Venosa Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: BMC Emerg Med Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA DE EMERGENCIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article