Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Outcomes of higher-order multiple pregnancies in an Australian setting.
Wong, Shian-Li; Emerson, Sandra; Jamaludin, Nadiah; Chang, Melissa H Y; Welsh, Alec.
Afiliación
  • Wong SL; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Emerson S; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Jamaludin N; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Chang MHY; School of Women's and Children's Health, The University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
  • Welsh A; Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Royal Hospital for Women, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol ; 63(3): 365-371, 2023 06.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36502275
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Higher-order multiple (HOM) pregnancies are associated with significant maternal and neonatal morbidity, especially consequent to preterm birth. Multi-fetal pregnancy reduction (MFPR) may be provided, though its benefits in prolonging gestation and improving neonatal outcomes must be weighed against its risks.

AIMS:

The aim was to compare outcomes of HOM pregnancies where expectant management was chosen (EM) with those where MFPR was provided.

METHODS:

The method involved a retrospective study of HOM pregnancies referred to a single quaternary hospital between 2007 and 2016. The primary outcome was gestational age. Secondary outcomes included miscarriage, nursery admission, hospital stay, Apgar scores, early fetal loss, stillbirth, neonatal death and composite fetal loss.

RESULTS:

Fifty-seven pregnancies were eligible for inclusion. Median gestation at birth (weeks) was significantly higher for MFPR (35.3 vs 33.1, P < 0.01). Pregnancies after MFPR were less likely to lead to preterm birth (63.2 vs 100.0%, P < 0.001), half as likely to birth before 34 weeks (31.6 vs 60.0%, P = 0.09) but similarly likely to extremely preterm birth (<28 weeks, 8.6 vs 10.5%, P = 0.58). Miscarriage was more likely after MFPR (13.6 vs 0%, P = 0.05). EM neonates were more likely to be admitted to the nursery (P < 0.01) and have longer hospital stay (29.6 vs 20.2 days, P = 0.05); however, they had similar Apgar scores.

CONCLUSION:

Our study demonstrates that MFPR is associated with an increase in gestational age, with a reduction by almost half of births before 34 weeks, but no difference in extremely preterm births; the latter represents the highest risk group. This should be used to guide management counselling for HOM pregnancies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Espontáneo / Nacimiento Prematuro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Aborto Espontáneo / Nacimiento Prematuro Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Newborn / Pregnancy País/Región como asunto: Oceania Idioma: En Revista: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia