Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How salience enhances inhibitory control: An analysis of electro-cortical mechanisms.
Kenemans, J Leon; Schutte, Iris; Van Bijnen, Sam; Logemann, H N Alexander.
Afiliación
  • Kenemans JL; Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, the Netherlands. Electronic address: j.l.kenemans@uu.nl.
  • Schutte I; Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.
  • Van Bijnen S; Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Centre for Interdisciplinary Brain Research, Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Finland.
  • Logemann HNA; Department of Experimental Psychology, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, the Netherlands; Institute of Psychology, ELTE, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary.
Biol Psychol ; 177: 108505, 2023 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669616
Stop-signal tasks (SSTs) combined with human electro-cortical recordings (Event-Related Potentials, ERPs) have revealed mechanisms associated with successful stopping (relative to failed), presumably contributing to inhibitory control. The corresponding ERP signatures have been labeled stop N1 (+/- 100-ms latency), stop N2 (200 ms), and stop P3 (160-250 ms), and argued to reflect more sensory-specific (N1) versus more generic (N2, P3) mechanisms. However, stop N1 and stop N2, as well as latencies of stop-P3, appear to be quite inconsistent across studies. The present work addressed the possible influence of stop-signal salience, expecting high salience to induce clear stop N1s but reduced stop N2s, and short-latency stop P3s. Three SST varieties were combined with high-resolution EEG. An imperative visual (go) stimulus was occasionally followed by a subsequent (stop) stimulus that signalled to withhold the just initiated response. Stop-Signal Reaction Times (SSRTs) decreased linearly from visual-low to visual-high-salience to auditory. Auditory Stop N1 was replicated. A C1-like visual evoked potential (latency < 100 ms) was observed only with high salience, but not robustly associated with successful versus failed stops. Using the successful-failed contrast a visual stop-N1 analogue (112-156 ms post-stop-signal) was identified, as was right-frontal stop N2, but neither was sensitive to salience. Stop P3 had shorter latency for high than for low salience, and the extent of the early high-salience stop P3 correlated inversely with SSRT. These results suggest that salience-enhanced inhibitory control as manifest in SSRTs is associated with generic rather than sensory-specific electrocortical mechanisms.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Electroencefalografía / Potenciales Evocados Visuales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Electroencefalografía / Potenciales Evocados Visuales Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Biol Psychol Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article