Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2: analysis of a COVID-19 observational registry for a diverse US metropolitan population.
Tannous, Jonika; Pan, Alan P; Potter, Thomas; Bako, Abdulaziz T; Dlouhy, Katharine; Drews, Ashley; Sostman, Henry Dirk; Vahidy, Farhaan S.
Afiliación
  • Tannous J; Department of Neurosurgery, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Pan AP; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Potter T; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Bako AT; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Dlouhy K; Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Drews A; Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Sostman HD; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
  • Vahidy FS; Houston Methodist Academic Institute, Houston Methodist, Houston, Texas, USA.
BMJ Open ; 13(4): e067611, 2023 04 05.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37019490
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

We evaluated the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC). DESIGN AND

SETTING:

A retrospective cohort study using a COVID-19 specific, electronic medical record-based surveillance and outcomes registry from an eight-hospital tertiary hospital system in the Houston metropolitan area. Analyses were replicated across a global research network database.

PARTICIPANTS:

We identified adult (≥18) patients with PASC. PASC was defined as experiencing constitutional (palpitations, malaise/fatigue, headache) or systemic (sleep disorder, shortness of breath, mood/anxiety disorders, cough and cognitive impairment) symptoms beyond the 28-day postinfection period. STATISTICAL

ANALYSIS:

We fit multivariable logistic regression models and report estimated likelihood of PASC associated with vaccination or mAb treatment as adjusted ORs with 95% CIs.

RESULTS:

Primary analyses included 53 239 subjects (54.9% female), of whom 5929, 11.1% (95% CI 10.9% to 11.4%), experienced PASC. Both vaccinated breakthrough cases (vs unvaccinated) and mAb-treated patients (vs untreated) had lower likelihoods for developing PASC, aOR (95% CI) 0.58 (0.52-0.66), and 0.77 (0.69-0.86), respectively. Vaccination was associated with decreased odds of developing all constitutional and systemic symptoms except for taste and smell changes. For all symptoms, vaccination was associated with lower likelihood of experiencing PASC compared with mAb treatment. Replication analysis found identical frequency of PASC (11.2%, 95% CI 11.1 to 11.3) and similar protective effects against PASC for the COVID-19 vaccine 0.25 (0.21-0.30) and mAb treatment 0.62 (0.59-0.66).

CONCLUSION:

Although both COVID-19 vaccines and mAbs decreased the likelihood of PASC, vaccination remains the most effective tool for the prevention of long-term consequences of COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vacunas contra la COVID-19 / COVID-19 / Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Vacunas contra la COVID-19 / COVID-19 / Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: BMJ Open Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos