Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring recovery in participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder: validation of the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC).
Sportel, B Esther; Aardema, Hettie; Boonstra, Nynke; Arends, Johannes; Rudd, Bridey; Metz, Margot J; Castelein, Stynke; Pijnenborg, Gerdina H M.
Afiliación
  • Sportel BE; Department of Psychotic Disorders Assen, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Dennenweg 9, 9404 LA, Assen, The Netherlands. Esther.Sportel@ggzdrenthe.nl.
  • Aardema H; Department of Psychotic Disorders Assen, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Dennenweg 9, 9404 LA, Assen, The Netherlands.
  • Boonstra N; Research Group Care and Innovation in Psychiatry, NHL Stenden University for Applied Sciences, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands.
  • Arends J; Department of Psychotic Disorders Assen, GGZ Drenthe Mental Health Institute, Dennenweg 9, 9404 LA, Assen, The Netherlands.
  • Rudd B; Mental Health Foundation, Glasgow, Scotland.
  • Metz MJ; GGz Breburg Mental Health Institute, Breda, The Netherlands.
  • Castelein S; Lentis Research, Lentis Psychiatric Institute, Groningen, The Netherlands.
  • Pijnenborg GHM; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, Faculty of Behavioural and Social Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
BMC Psychiatry ; 23(1): 296, 2023 04 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37118681
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

To improve recovery in mental health, validated instruments are needed.

AIMS:

This study evaluates psychometric properties of the Individual Recovery Outcomes Counter (I.ROC) in a Dutch population of participants with a schizophrenia spectrum disorder (SSD).

METHODS:

326 participants completed the I.ROC at baseline (n = 326), six months (n = 155) and twelve months (n = 84) as part of a routine outcome assessment. Reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and internal factor structure were examined.

RESULTS:

Participants evaluated the I.ROC as comprehensive. Internal consistency of the I.ROC (α = 0.88) and test-retest reliability (r = .85, p < .001) are good. Negative moderate correlations with the total score of the PANSS (r=-.50, p < .001) and the HoNOS (r=-.52, p < .001) were found, and a small negative correlation with the FR tool (r=-.36, p < .001). Moderate positive correlation with the MANSA (r = .55, p < .001) and the RAS (r = .60, p < .001) were found. The mean total I.ROC scores increased significantly between time points (F(2,166) = 6.351, p < .005), although differences were small. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that fit indices for the one-, two-, and four-factor model are comparable.

CONCLUSIONS:

The I.ROC is a valid and reliable instrument, with sensitivity to change, to map recovery in participants with SSD.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esquizofrenia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychiatry Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Esquizofrenia Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Psychiatry Asunto de la revista: PSIQUIATRIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos