Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of clinical and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy outcomes between in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling mature oocytes from high-risk patients: A retrospective study.
Kim, Jun-Woo; Lee, So-Young; Hur, Chang-Young; Lim, Jin-Ho; Park, Choon-Keun.
Afiliación
  • Kim JW; In Vitro Fertilization Center, Maria S Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee SY; Department of Applied Animal Science, College of Animal Life Sciences, Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
  • Hur CY; In Vitro Fertilization Center, Maria S Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Lim JH; In Vitro Fertilization Center, Maria S Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park CK; In Vitro Fertilization Center, Maria S Fertility Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 49(9): 2343-2350, 2023 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37365000
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To evaluate the influence of insemination methods on clinical outcomes by assessing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) outcomes in embryos obtained using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in sibling mature oocytes from high-risk patients.

METHODS:

This retrospective study involved 108 couples with nonmale or mild male factor infertility who underwent split insemination cycles from January 2018 to December 2021. PGT-A was performed using trophectoderm biopsy, array comparative genome hybridization, or next-generation sequencing with 24-chromosome screening.

RESULTS:

Mature oocytes were divided into IVF (n = 660) and ICSI (n = 1028) groups. The normal fertilization incidence was similar between the groups (81.1% vs. 84.6%). The total number of blastocysts biopsied was significantly higher in the IVF group than in the ICSI group (59.3% vs. 52.6%; p = 0.018). However, euploidy (34.4% vs. 31.9%) and aneuploidy (63.4% vs. 66.2%) rates per biopsy and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0% vs. 58.8%) were similar between the groups. Implantation (45.6% vs. 50.8%) and live birth or ongoing pregnancy (52.0% vs 58.8%) rates were slightly higher in the ICSI group than in the IVF group and miscarriage rate per transfer was slightly higher in the IVF group than in the ICSI group (12.0% vs 5.9%); however no significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

IVF and ICSI using sibling mature oocytes had similar clinical outcomes, and euploidy and aneuploidy rates in couples with nonmale and mild male factor infertility. These results suggest that IVF is a useful option, along with ICSI, as an insemination method in PGT-A cycles, especially in high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas / Infertilidad Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Inyecciones de Esperma Intracitoplasmáticas / Infertilidad Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: J Obstet Gynaecol Res Asunto de la revista: GINECOLOGIA / OBSTETRICIA Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article