Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparative Assessment of Diet Quality and Adherence to a Structured Nutrition and Exercise Intervention Compared with Usual Care in Pregnancy in a Randomized Trial.
Dempsey, Kendra; Mottola, Michelle F; Atkinson, Stephanie A.
Afiliación
  • Dempsey K; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Mottola MF; School of Kinesiology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.
  • Atkinson SA; Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Curr Dev Nutr ; 7(6): 100097, 2023 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37441683
Background: In trials testing the efficacy of diet and exercise modifications during pregnancy on health outcomes, assessment of participant adherence to interventions of diet and exercise is rarely reported, with few standard methods existing to measure adherence. Objective: We aimed to assess the maternal diet quality and create an algorithm to evaluate adherence to an intervention of high protein/dairy nutrition and walking exercise from early pregnancy to birth. Methods: In Be Healthy in Pregnancy randomized trial (NCT01693510), diet quality was measured using scores from an adapted PrimeScreen food frequency questionnaire, nutrient intake assessed by 3-day diet records, and physical activity using accelerometry at 14-17 (early), 26-28 (middle), and 36-38 (late) weeks' gestation. A novel adherence score was derived by combining data for compliance with prescribed protein and energy intakes and daily step counts in the intervention group. Between-group diet quality scores and changes in adherence scores in the intervention group across pregnancy were analyzed using generalized estimating equations adjusted for prepregnancy body mass index and study site. Results: Diet scores were similar for intervention (n = 55) and control (n = 56) groups at baseline but only the intervention group significantly improved and maintained their scores from early to middle (18.7 ± 7.6 vs. 22.9 ± 6.1; P < 0.001) and late (22.5 ± 6.9; P < 0.008) pregnancy. Protein intake was significantly (P < 0.001) higher but energy intakes were similar in the intervention group compared with those in the control group. Adherence scores for the intervention increased significantly (P < 0.01) from early (1.52 ± 0.70) to midpregnancy (1.89 ± 0.82) but declined from midpregnancy to late (1.55 ± 0.78; P < 0.0005) pregnancy primarily owing to lower step counts. Conclusions: Adherence to an intervention may decline toward the end of pregnancy, particularly in maintaining physical activity. Creation of adherence scores is a feasible approach to measure combined intervention compliance for diet and physical activity and may increase transparency in interpreting results of randomized trials in pregnancy.This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01689961 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01689961?cond=NCT01689961&rank=1; registered on 21 September 2012).
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Curr Dev Nutr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: Curr Dev Nutr Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Canadá