Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of the Effects of Phacoemulsification and Dexamethasone Implantation in the Same Session with Other Phakic Conditions.
Ozturk, Yucel; Calli, Umit; Gungor, Bengi; Kumral, Esra Turkseven; Balci, Sevcan Yildiz; Kugu, Suleyman; Yenerel, Nursal Melda.
Afiliación
  • Ozturk Y; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Calli U; Department of Ophthalmology, University Health Sciences, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Gungor B; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Kumral ET; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Balci SY; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Kugu S; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
  • Yenerel NM; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Health Sciences Haydarpasa Numune Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Beyoglu Eye J ; 8(2): 81-90, 2023.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37521876
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

The objective of the study is to evaluate anatomical and functional results such as best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients who received intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant for diabetic macular edema (DME), and to compare the efficacy according to patients' lens status and concurrent phacoemulsification surgery.

Methods:

A total of 70 eyes of 55 patients with DME who received intravitreal DEX implantation were included in this retrospective study. Patients who received intravitreal DEX implantation were divided into three groups phaco-DEX (group 1), pseudophakic (group 2), and phakic (group 3). The BCVA, CMT, and IOP changes were compared between the three groups.

Results:

One month after the intravitreal DEX implant, BCVA improved in all three groups. (p=0.001, p=0.01, and p=0.009, respectively). There was a decrease in CMT at the end of 1st and 4th months in all three groups compared to the preoperative measurements (p=0.005, p<0.001, p<0.001 respectively). While IOP was increased in group 2 and group 3, no IOP increase was observed in group 1. (p=0.41, p=0.01, and p=0.01, respectively).

Conclusion:

Combining intravitreal DEX implantation with phacoemulsification surgery seems to be an effective and reliable method in patients with DME accompanied by cataract. The IOP elevation in follow-up visits of phakic and pseudophakic patients after intravitreal DEX implantation was not observed in the Phaco-DEX group.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Beyoglu Eye J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies Idioma: En Revista: Beyoglu Eye J Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article