Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prophylactic platelet transfusion response in critically ill patients: a prospective multicentre observational study.
Reizine, Florian; Le Marec, Sarah; Le Meur, Anthony; Consigny, Maëlys; Berteau, Florian; Bodenes, Laetitia; Geslain, Marie; McQuilten, Zoe; Le Niger, Catherine; Huntzinger, Julien; Seguin, Philippe; Thibert, Jean-Baptiste; Simon, David; Reignier, Jean; Egreteau, Pierre-Yves; Tadié, Jean-Marc; Huet, Olivier; Asfar, Pierre; Ehrmann, Stephan; Aubron, Cécile.
Afiliación
  • Reizine F; Maladies Infectieuses Et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Le Marec S; Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Vannes, Vannes, France.
  • Le Meur A; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Brest, Site La Cavale Blanche, Bvd Tanguy Prigent, 29609, Brest Cedex, France.
  • Consigny M; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Berteau F; Service de Biostatistiques, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Bodenes L; Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Morlaix, Morlaix, France.
  • Geslain M; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire de Brest, Site La Cavale Blanche, Bvd Tanguy Prigent, 29609, Brest Cedex, France.
  • McQuilten Z; Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Le Niger C; Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre (ANZIC-RC), Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
  • Huntzinger J; Unité d'hémovigilance, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Seguin P; Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Vannes, Vannes, France.
  • Thibert JB; Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Simon D; Etablissement Français du Sang Bretagne, Rennes, France.
  • Reignier J; Service de Biostatistiques, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Egreteau PY; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU de Nantes, Nantes, France.
  • Tadié JM; Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, CH de Morlaix, Morlaix, France.
  • Huet O; Maladies Infectieuses Et Réanimation Médicale, CHU de Rennes, Rennes, France.
  • Asfar P; Département d'anesthésie-Réanimation, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, CHU de Brest, Brest, France.
  • Ehrmann S; Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France.
  • Aubron C; Médecine Intensive Réanimation, CHRU de Tours INSERM CIC 1415, CRICS-TriggerSEP F-CRIN Research Network, INSERM U1100, Université de Tours FR, Tours, France.
Crit Care ; 27(1): 373, 2023 09 27.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37759268
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Response to prophylactic platelet transfusion is suspected to be inconsistent in critically ill patients questioning how to optimize transfusion practices. This study aimed to describe prophylactic platelet transfusion response, to identify factors associated with a suboptimal response, to analyse the correlation between corrected count increment and platelet count increment and to determine the association between poor platelet transfusion response and clinical outcomes.

METHODS:

This prospective multicentre observational study recruited patients who received at least one prophylactic platelet transfusion in one of the nine participating intensive care units for a period up to 16 months. Poor platelet transfusion response was defined as a corrected count increment (CCI) that adjusts for platelet dose and body surface area, less than 7 at 18-24 h after platelet transfusion. Factors associated with poor platelet transfusion response were assessed in a mixed-effect model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted in patients with and without haematology malignancy and chemotherapy.

RESULTS:

Poor platelet transfusion response occurred in 349 of the 472 (73.9%) prophylactic platelet transfusions and in 141/181 (77.9%) patients. The mixed-effect model identified haemoglobin at ICU admission (odds ratio (OR) 0.79 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.7-0.89]) and body mass index (BMI) (OR 0.93 [0.89-0.98]) being positively and independently associated with platelet transfusion response, while a haematological malignancy (OR 1.93 [1.09-3.43]), sepsis as primary ICU admission diagnosis (OR 2.81 [1.57-5.03]), SOFA score (OR 1.10 [1.03; 1.17]) and maximum storage duration of platelet (OR 1.24 [1.02-1.52]) were independently associated with a suboptimal platelet increment. Clinical outcomes did not differ between groups, nor the requirement for red blood cells. Poor platelet transfusion response was found in 93.5% of patients with haematology malignancy and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS:

In this study of critically ill patients, of whom more than half had bone marrow failure, almost three quarters of prophylactic platelet transfusions led to suboptimal platelet increment measured 18 to 24 h following platelet transfusion. Platelet storage duration was the only factor associated with poor platelet response that may be accessible to intervention. Trial registration in October 2017 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03325140.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombocitopenia / Neoplasias Hematológicas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Trombocitopenia / Neoplasias Hematológicas Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Año: 2023 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia