Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Pregnant Patients With Brain and Head and Neck Cancers.
Dupere, Justine M; Lucido, John J; Breen, William G; Mahajan, Anita; Stafford, Scott L; Bradley, Thomas B; Blackwell, Charles R; Remmes, Nicholas B.
Afiliación
  • Dupere JM; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: dupere.justine@mayo.edu.
  • Lucido JJ; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Breen WG; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Mahajan A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Stafford SL; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Bradley TB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Blackwell CR; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Remmes NB; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 118(3): 853-858, 2024 Mar 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37820769
PURPOSE: When radiation therapy is medically necessary for pregnant patients, photon-based treatments (XRT) have traditionally been used, whereas proton radiation therapy (PRT) is avoided due to concerns about neutron dose. This retrospective study analyzes pregnant patients treated with XRT and models the equivalent dose that would have been delivered to the fetus with proton radiation compared with XRT. The purpose of this work is to provide a comprehensive analysis of pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PRT) for pregnant patients and to evaluate whether PBS-PRT should be the new standard of practice for treating pregnant patients with brain and head and neck cancers. METHODS AND MATERIALS: PBS-PRT plans were made for seven pregnant patients who received XRT: four treated for brain tumors and three for head and neck tumors. Measurements were performed with the patient plans using an anthropomorphic phantom and Wendi-2 meter placed at the phantom's abdomen. Patient-specific measurements were used to determine the total fetal equivalent dose from PBS-PRT compared with XRT. Imaging dose was also evaluated with a Fluke 451 dose meter. RESULTS: The average measured fetal equivalent dose, accounting for photons and neutrons, for the brain plans was 0.4 mSv for PBS-PRT and 7 mSv for XRT. For the head and neck plans, it was 6 mSv and 90 mSv for PBS-PRT and XRT, respectively. The PBS-PRT plans were preferred by the physicians for both tumor coverage and normal-tissue sparing. Daily imaging added between 0.05 and 1.5 mSv to the total dose. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study showed that when treating brain or head and neck cancers in pregnant patients, fetal equivalent dose is reduced by approximately a factor of 10 with PBS-PRT compared with XRT without making any compromises in treatment planning objectives. These results support a change of practice to using PBS-PRT as the new standard for treating pregnant patients with brain or head and neck tumors compared with XRT.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Protones / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Terapia de Protones / Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article