Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The efficacy of combining cognitive training and noninvasive brain stimulation: A transdiagnostic systematic review and meta-analysis.
Poppe, Anika; Ritter, Franziska D E; Bais, Leonie; Pustejovsky, James E; van Tol, Marie-José; Curcic-Blake, Branislava; Pijnenborg, Gerdina H M; van der Meer, Lisette.
Afiliación
  • Poppe A; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen.
  • Ritter FDE; Department of Medical Psychology, Neuropsychology and Gender Studies, University Hospital Cologne.
  • Bais L; Department of Rehabilitation, Lentis Psychiatric Institute.
  • Pustejovsky JE; Department of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
  • van Tol MJ; Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen.
  • Curcic-Blake B; Department of Biomedical Sciences of Cells and Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience Center, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen.
  • Pijnenborg GHM; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen.
  • van der Meer L; Department of Clinical and Developmental Neuropsychology, University of Groningen.
Psychol Bull ; 150(2): 192-213, 2024 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956054
ABSTRACT
Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies investigated the innovative approach of supplementing cognitive training (CT) with noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) to increase the effects on outcomes. In this review, we aim to summarize the evidence for this treatment combination. We identified 72 published and unpublished studies (reporting 773 effect sizes), including 2,518 participants from healthy and clinical populations indexed in PubMed, MEDLINE, APA PsycInfo, ProQuest, Web of Science, and https//ClinicalTrials.gov (last search August 9, 2022) that compared the effects of NIBS combined with CT on cognitive, symptoms, and everyday functioning to CT alone at postintervention and/or follow-up. We performed random-effects meta-analyses with robust variance estimation and assessed risk of bias with the Cochrane ROB tool. Only four studies had low risk of bias in all domains, and many studies lacked standard controls such as keeping the outcome assessor and trainer unaware of the treatment condition. Following sensitivity analyses, only learning/memory robustly improved significantly more when CT was combined with NIBS compared to CT only (g = 0.18, 95% CI [0.07, 0.29]) at postintervention, but not in the long term. The effect was small and limited by substantial heterogeneity. The other seven cognitive outcome domains, symptoms, and everyday functioning did not benefit from adding NIBS to CT. Given the methodological limitation of prior studies, more high-quality trials that focus on the potential of combining NIBS and CT to enhance benefits in everyday functioning in the short and long term are needed to evaluate whether combining NIBS and CT is relevant for clinical practice. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Entrenamiento Cognitivo / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Bull Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Entrenamiento Cognitivo / Aprendizaje Tipo de estudio: Systematic_reviews Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Psychol Bull Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article