Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Translated article] Design of a panel of indicators for antibiotic stewardship programs in the Emergency Department.
Ruiz-Ramos, Jesús; Santolaya-Perrín, María Rosario; González-Del-Castillo, Juan; Candel, Francisco Javier; Martín-Quirós, Alejandro; López-Contreras-González, Joaquín; Julián-Jiménez, Agustín; Suárez-Lledó-Grande, Ana.
Afiliación
  • Ruiz-Ramos J; Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Santa Creu y San Pau, Catalonia, Spain. Electronic address: jrzrms@gmail.com.
  • Santolaya-Perrín MR; Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Príncipe de Asturias, Madrid, Spain.
  • González-Del-Castillo J; Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Candel FJ; Infectious diseases-Clinical Microbiology, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martín-Quirós A; Servicio de Urgencias, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • López-Contreras-González J; Unidad de Enfermedades Infecciosas, Hospital Santa Creu y San Pau, Madrid, Spain.
  • Julián-Jiménez A; Servicio de Urgencias, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
  • Suárez-Lledó-Grande A; Servicio de Farmacia, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Farm Hosp ; 48(2): T57-T63, 2024.
Article en En, Es | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38148256
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To develop a panel of indicators to monitor antimicrobial stewardship programs activity in the emergency department.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary group consisting of experts in the management of infection in emergency departments and the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASP) evaluated a proposal of indicators using a modified Delphi methodology. In the first round, each expert classified the relevance of each proposed indicators in two dimensions (healthcare impact and ease of implementation) and two attributes (prioritisation level and frequency). The second round was conducted based on the modified questionnaire according to the suggestions raised and new indicators suggested. Experts modified the prioritisation order and rated the new indicators in the same manner as in the first round.

RESULTS:

61 potential indicators divided into four groups were proposed consumption indicators, microbiological indicators, process indicators, and outcome indicators. After analysing the scores and comments from the first round, 31 indicators were classified as high priority, 25 as intermediate priority, and 5 as low priority. Moreover, 18 new indicators were generated. Following the second round, all 61 initially proposed indicators were retained, and 18 new indicators were incorporated 11 classified as high priority, 3 as intermediate priority, and 4 as low priority.

CONCLUSIONS:

The experts agreed on a panel of ASP Indicators adapted to the emergency services prioritised by level of relevance. This is as a helpful tool for the development of these programs and will contribute to monitoring the appropriateness of the use of antimicrobials in these units.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Antiinfecciosos Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Farm Hosp Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Servicios Médicos de Urgencia / Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos / Antiinfecciosos Límite: Humans Idioma: En / Es Revista: Farm Hosp Asunto de la revista: FARMACIA / HOSPITAIS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article