Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The value of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders in patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer after progression on ≥ 1 line of endocrine therapy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Huang, Xiewei; Yu, Yushuai; Luo, Shiping; Fu, Wenfen; Zhang, Jie; Song, Chuangui.
Afiliación
  • Huang X; Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xin Quan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
  • Yu Y; Breast Surgery Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
  • Luo S; Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xin Quan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
  • Fu W; Breast Surgery Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
  • Zhang J; Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, No. 29, Xin Quan Road, Gulou District, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
  • Song C; Breast Surgery Institute, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350001, Fujian Province, China.
BMC Cancer ; 24(1): 21, 2024 Jan 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38166684
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Currently, the value of oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (aBC) after progression on ≥ 1 line of endocrine therapy (ET) remains controversial. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and safety benefits in several clinical trials. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and conference proceedings (SABCS, ASCO, ESMO, and ESMO Breast) were searched systematically and comprehensively. Random effects models or fixed effects models were used to assess pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for treatment with oral SERDs versus standard of care.

RESULTS:

A total of four studies involving 1,290 patients were included in our analysis. The hazard ratio (HR) of PFS showed that the oral SERD regimen was better than standard of care in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC after progression on ≥ 1 line of ET (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.91, p = 0.004). In patients with ESR1 mutations, the oral SERD regimen provided better PFS than standard of care (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.71, p < 0.00001). Regarding patients with disease progression following previous use of CDK4/6 inhibitors, PFS benefit was observed in oral SERD-treatment arms compared to standard of care (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64-0.87, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSIONS:

The oral SERD regimen provides a significant PFS benefit compared to standard-of-care ET in patients with HR+/HER2- aBC after progression on ≥ 1 line of ET. In particular, we recommend oral SERDs as a preferred choice for those patients with ESR1m, and it could be a potential replacement for fulvestrant. The oral SERD regimen is also beneficial after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer / BMC cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias de la Mama Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: BMC Cancer / BMC cancer Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China