Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Introducing a novel respiratory function monitor for neonatal resuscitation training.
Dalley, A M; Hodgson, K A; Dawson, J A; Tracy, M B; Davis, P G; Thio, M.
Afiliación
  • Dalley AM; Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
  • Hodgson KA; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
  • Dawson JA; Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
  • Tracy MB; Department of Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Newborn Health, The University of Melbourne, Level 7, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
  • Davis PG; Paediatric Infant and Perinatal Emergency Retrieval, The Royal Children's Hospital, 50 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
  • Thio M; Newborn Research Centre, The Royal Women's Hospital, Level 7, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia.
Resusc Plus ; 17: 100535, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38234876
ABSTRACT

Background:

A respiratory function monitor (RFM) gives immediate feedback, allowing clinicians to adjust face mask ventilation to correct leak or inappropriate tidal volumes. We audited the satisfaction of clinicians with a neonatal resuscitation training package, incorporating a novel RFM.

Methods:

This was a mixed-methods study conducted at The Royal Women's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia. Clinicians were approached to complete a neonatal resuscitation training session. Participants watched a training video, then provided ventilation to term and preterm manikins first without, and then with, the RFM. Clinicians completed a survey after the session and undertook a follow-up session three months later. The primary outcome was participant satisfaction with the RFM. Secondary outcomes included participants' self-assessment of face mask leak and tidal volumes when using the RFM.

Results:

Fifty clinicians completed both the initial and follow-up session. Participants reported high levels of satisfaction with the RFM for both term and preterm manikins on a scale from 0, meaning "not at all", and 100, meaning "yes, for all resuscitations", the median response (interquartile range, IQR) was 82 (74-94) vs 81.5 (69-94.5). Levels of satisfaction were similar for less experienced and more experienced clinicians median (IQR) 83 (77-93) vs 81 (71.5-95) respectively. When using the monitor, clinicians accurately self-assessed that they achieved leak below 30% and tidal volumes within the target range at least 80% of the time.

Conclusion:

Clinicians of all experience levels had a high level of satisfaction with a training package including a novel RFM.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Resusc Plus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Resusc Plus Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia