Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Randomized controlled multi-centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data.
Thoma, Daniel S; Haas, Robert; Sporniak-Tutak, Katarzyna; Garcia, Abel; Taylor, Thomas D; Tutak, Marcin; Pohl, Veronika; Hämmerle, Christoph H F.
Afiliación
  • Thoma DS; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
  • Haas R; Akademie für Orale Implantologie, Private Practice, Vienna, Austria.
  • Sporniak-Tutak K; Aesthetic Dent, Private Practice, Szczecin, Poland.
  • Garcia A; University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
  • Taylor TD; University of Connecticut, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
  • Tutak M; Aesthetic Dent, Private Practice, Szczecin, Poland.
  • Pohl V; Akademie für Orale Implantologie, Private Practice, Vienna, Austria.
  • Hämmerle CHF; Clinic of Reconstructive Dentistry Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
J Clin Periodontol ; 51(4): 499-509, 2024 04.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38296249
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To compare implant survival and complication rates between shorter and standard-length implants with sinus augmentation and restored with single crowns, at 10 years of loading. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

One-hundred and one patients (137 implants) with a ridge height of 5-7 mm in the posterior maxilla were randomly assigned to two treatment modalities shorter implants (6 mm) (group short [GS]) or standard-length implants (11-15 mm) with sinus grafting (group graft [GG]). Following the insertion of final restorations, patients were regularly recalled for up to 10 years. Assessed outcomes encompassed implant survival, marginal bone levels (MBLs), biological and technical parameters and patient-reported outcome measures (OHIP-49 = Oral Health Impact Profile). Non-parametric statistical analysis was used to analyse the data.

RESULTS:

For the 5- to 10-year follow-up period, 77 patients with 105 implants (GS 36 patients/48 implants; GG 41/57) were available for re-examination (drop-out rate 21%). Implant survival rates at the patient level were 96.0% (GS; 2 failures) and 100% (GG) (inter-group p = .24). Median MBLs amounted to 0.00 mm (min 0.00; max 3.25; GS) and 0.00 mm (min 0.00; max 4.55; GG) (inter-group p = .73). Technical complications predominantly occurred within the first 5 years (inter-group p > .05). Peri-implantitis rates were 4.2% (GS) and 13.3% (GG) (intergroup p = .37). Median OHIP-49 scores were 7.00 (0.00; 39.00; GS) and 9.00 (0.00; 196; GG) (inter-group p = .61) at 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS:

Based on similar 10-year implant survival rates, reduced patient morbidity and lower costs, the use of shorter dental implants might well serve as an alternative treatment concept to longer implants placed in conjunction with sinus grafting for patients with a limited ridge height in the posterior maxilla. Study register https//clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01030523.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Implantes Dentales / Elevación del Piso del Seno Maxilar Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Periodontol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suiza