Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
First Phase Development of a Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Midface Oncology.
Yung, Amanda E; Luong, Jason; Crouch, Gareth; Hong, Angela M; Ananda, Arjuna; Taylor, Simon; Kotronakis, Ilias; Low, Tsu-Hui Hubert; Elliott, Michael S; McBride, Kate; Rutherford, Claudia; Clark, Jonathan R; Ch'ng, Sydney.
Afiliación
  • Yung AE; From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Luong J; Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Crouch G; From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Hong AM; Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Ananda A; From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Taylor S; Institute of Academic Surgery at Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Kotronakis I; From the Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Low TH; Department of Radiation Oncology, Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Elliott MS; Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • McBride K; Department of Ear, Nose and Throat Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Rutherford C; Department of Oculoplastic Surgery, Sydney Adventist Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Clark JR; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • Ch'ng S; Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW Australia.
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open ; 12(3): e5689, 2024 Mar.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38525491
ABSTRACT

Background:

Facial cancer surgery involving the midface (comprising the lower eyelids, nose, cheeks, and upper lip) can have debilitating life-changing functional, social, and psychological impacts on the patient. Midface symptoms are inadequately captured by existing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are increasingly used for individual patient care, quality improvement, and standardized reporting of treatment outcomes. This study aimed to present our findings from the first phase of the development of a midface, specifically periocular and nasal, PROM.

Methods:

After international guidance for PROM development, the first phase comprised identification of salient issues and item generation. Fifteen patients who had midface surgery and 10 clinicians from various specialties with more than 5 years' experience treating these patients were recruited. Semi-structured interviews explored aesthetic, functional, social, and psychological outcomes, with specific attention to deficiencies in current PROMs. Thematic analysis was used to develop an item pool, and group interviews with clinicians were carried out to create and refine PROM scales.

Results:

Qualitative data from patient interviews were grouped into aesthetic, functional, and psychosocial domains for the eyelids and nose. Ninety-nine draft items were generated across these domains. Following focus group discussions, the final version of the midface-specific PROM contained 31 items (13 eye-specific, 10-nose-specific, eight general midface items).

Conclusions:

This midface-specific PROM is valuable in assessing and comparing patient-reported outcomes in those who have undergone complex resection and reconstruction of the midface. This PROM is currently undergoing field testing.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Australia