Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Family perspectives on provider conversations about housing needs for children with medical complexity.
Smith, Brandon M; Donohue, Pamela K; Seltzer, Rebecca R.
Afiliación
  • Smith BM; Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Donohue PK; Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
  • Seltzer RR; Department of Population, Family, and Reproductive Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Child Care Health Dev ; 50(2): e13253, 2024 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38529766
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Children with medical complexity (CMC) have unique, and often unmet, housing needs that place them at risk for housing insecurity and poor health outcomes. Yet, little is known about how families with CMC discuss their housing needs with healthcare providers. We sought to understand (1) how housing is currently discussed between CMC caregivers and healthcare providers, and (2) how CMC caregivers want such conversations to occur.

METHODS:

From August to November 2020, we conducted semi-structured interviews with parents/guardians of CMC (<26 years old) in Maryland as part of a larger study to understand their housing experience. Four questions on communication with providers about housing were developed a priori and included in this analysis. Qualitative content analysis was applied to interview transcripts.

RESULTS:

Among 31 completed interviews, most participants were female (90%), lived in single-family homes (68%) and were from a mix of neighbourhood types (urban 19%, suburban 58%, rural 22%). Their children ranged in age from 6 months to 22 years, had a mix of insurance types (public 65%, private 29%, both 6%) and nearly all required medical equipment or technology. Four themes emerged (1) Current housing conversations are rare and superficial, (2) Ideal housing conversations would result in thoughtful care plans and concrete supports, (3) Frequency and initiation of housing conversations are best tailored to family preferences and (4) Value of housing conversations are limited by lack of provider knowledge and time.

CONCLUSIONS:

Conversations about housing needs for CMC happen in limited ways with healthcare providers, despite a desire on the part of their caregivers. Such conversations can give meaningful insights into the family's specific housing challenges, allowing providers to appropriately tailor care plans and referrals. Future work is needed to capture provider perspectives, design CMC-specific housing screeners and develop interdisciplinary referral strategies.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Vivienda Límite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Child Care Health Dev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cuidadores / Vivienda Límite: Adult / Child / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Child Care Health Dev Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos