[Prehospital care of anaphylactic reactions by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden : An analysis of treatment and outcome]. / Präklinische Versorgung von anaphylaktischen Reaktionen durch die Dresdner Luft- und Bodenrettung : Analyse von Therapie und Outcome.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis can lead to a life-threatening situation. Therefore, rapid diagnosis and emergency treatment is indicated. Immediate treatment with intramuscular adrenaline (or intravascularly with sufficient medical expertise) in anaphylaxis with cardiovascular and/or respiratory symptoms is recommended by various guidelines. Previous studies have shown that anaphylaxis is often not treated according to guidelines and that adrenaline in particular is rarely administered. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate the data on emergency treatment and outcomes of patients with anaphylaxis by the air rescue and ground-based emergency services Dresden. Moreover, the results of the air- and ground-based services were compared. The focus was on administration of adrenaline and outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the ground-based emergency service Dresden (from 2012 to 2016) and the air rescue service Dresden (from 2008 to 2015) related to anaphylactic reactions were analyzed retrospectively. The severity of the anaphylaxis, the emergency medication administered, further monitoring, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Data from 152 adults/29 children were analyzed for air rescue and 1131 adults/223 children for the ground-based emergency service. Adults with grade II-IV anaphylaxis received adrenaline in 19% (air rescue) and 7% (ground rescue) of cases. Children with grade II-IV anaphylaxis received adrenaline in 7% (air rescue) and 8% (ground rescue) of cases. Immediate drug therapy led to an improvement in general condition in 96-98% (air rescue) and 72-77% (ground-based emergency service) of cases. A significant correlation was found between the administration of adrenaline and the improvement in outcome in the ground-based emergency cohort. CONCLUSION: Guideline-compliant first-line therapy with adrenaline was not performed in the majority of the cases analyzed in this study. The significant effect of adrenaline on outcome demonstrated in this study emphases the need to improve the emergency treatment of anaphylactic reactions.