Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A shared pattern of midfacial bone modelling in hominids suggests deep evolutionary roots for human facial morphogenesis.
Schuh, Alexandra; Heuzé, Yann; Gunz, Philipp; Berthaume, Michael A; Shaw, Colin N; Hublin, Jean-Jacques; Freidline, Sarah.
Afiliación
  • Schuh A; CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, PACEA, UMR 5199, Université de Bordeaux, Bât. B2, Allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Pessac 33615, France.
  • Heuzé Y; Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
  • Gunz P; CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, PACEA, UMR 5199, Université de Bordeaux, Bât. B2, Allée Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Pessac 33615, France.
  • Berthaume MA; Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
  • Shaw CN; Department of Engineering, Faculty of Natural, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Hublin JJ; Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Freidline S; Department of Human Origins, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Proc Biol Sci ; 291(2021): 20232738, 2024 Apr 30.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38628118
ABSTRACT
Midfacial morphology varies between hominoids, in particular between great apes and humans for which the face is small and retracted. The underlying developmental processes for these morphological differences are still largely unknown. Here, we investigate the cellular mechanism of maxillary development (bone modelling, BM), and how potential changes in this process may have shaped facial evolution. We analysed cross-sectional developmental series of gibbons, orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and present-day humans (n = 183). Individuals were organized into five age groups according to their dental development. To visualize each species's BM pattern and corresponding morphology during ontogeny, maps based on microscopic data were mapped onto species-specific age group average shapes obtained using geometric morphometrics. The amount of bone resorption was quantified and compared between species. Great apes share a highly similar BM pattern, whereas gibbons have a distinctive resorption pattern. This suggests a change in cellular activity on the hominid branch. Humans possess most of the great ape pattern, but bone resorption is high in the canine area from birth on, suggesting a key role of canine reduction in facial evolution. We also observed that humans have high levels of bone resorption during childhood, a feature not shared with other apes.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resorción Ósea / Hominidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proc Biol Sci Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Resorción Ósea / Hominidae Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Proc Biol Sci Asunto de la revista: BIOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Francia