Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
STAPLED FASCIAL CLOSURE VS. CONTINUOUS HAND-SEWN SUTURE: EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF THE ABDOMINAL WALL ON PORCINE MODEL AND HUMAN CADAVER.
Tustumi, Francisco; Darce, George Felipe Bezerra; Lobo Filho, Murillo Macedo; Abdalla, Ricardo Zugaib; Costa, Thiago Nogueira.
Afiliación
  • Tustumi F; Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Darce GFB; Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Lobo Filho MM; Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Abdalla RZ; Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Costa TN; Universidade de São Paulo, Department of Gastroenterology - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
Arq Bras Cir Dig ; 37: e1800, 2024.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38716920
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

One of the primary complications associated with large incisions in abdominal surgery is the increased risk of fascial closure rupture and incisional hernia development. The choice of the fascial closure method and closing with minimal tension and trauma is crucial for optimal results, emphasizing the importance of uniform pressure along the suture line to withstand intra-abdominal pressure.

AIMS:

To evaluate the resistance to pressure and tension of stapled and sutured hand-sewn fascial closure in the abdominal wall.

METHODS:

Nine abdominal wall flaps from human cadavers and 12 pigs were used for the experimentation. An abdominal defect was induced after the resection of the abdominal wall and the creation of a flap in the cadaveric model and after performing a midline incision in the porcine models. The models were randomized into three groups. Group 1 was treated with a one-layer hand-sewn small bite suture, Group 2 was treated with a two-layer hand-sewn small bite suture, and Group 3 was treated with a two-layer stapled closure. Tension measurements were assessed in cadaveric models, and intra-abdominal pressure was measured in porcine models.

RESULTS:

In the human cadaveric model, the median threshold for fascial rupture was 300N (300-350) in Group 1, 400N (350-500) in Group 2, and 350N (300-380) in Group 3. Statistical comparisons revealed non-significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.072, p>0.05), Group 1 and Group 3 (p=0.346, p>0.05), and Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.184, p>0.05). For porcine subjects, Group 1 showed a median pressure of 80 mmHg (85-105), Group 2 had a median of 92.5 mmHg (65-95), and Group 3 had a median of 102.5 mmHg (80-135). Statistical comparisons indicated non-significant differences between Group 1 and Group 2 (p=0.243, p>0.05), Group 1 and Group 3 (p=0.468, p>0.05), and Group 2 and Group 3 (p=0.083, p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS:

Stapled and conventional suturing resist similar pressure and tension thresholds.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cadáver / Técnicas de Sutura / Pared Abdominal Límite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arq Bras Cir Dig Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Cadáver / Técnicas de Sutura / Pared Abdominal Límite: Animals / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Arq Bras Cir Dig Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Brasil