Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Utilization of Face-to-Face Vestibular Support Groups: A Comparison to Online Group Participation.
Vanstrum, Erik B; Jung Kim, Min; Ziltzer, Ryan S; Doherty, Joni K; Bassett, Alaina M.
Afiliación
  • Vanstrum EB; Department of Head and Neck Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Jung Kim M; David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Ziltzer RS; David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Doherty JK; Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Bassett AM; Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(8): 713-719, 2024 Aug.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38738670
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

This study compared the utilization and outcomes of face-to-face (F2F) vestibular support groups and online support communities (OSC) for individuals with vestibular disorders.

METHODS:

We distributed a 31-question anonymous electronic survey through the Vestibular Disorders Association (VeDA) to F2F participants, categorizing user involvement in F2F, OSCs, or both and assessed impact on medical decision-making, psychosocial benefits, and goals achieved.

RESULTS:

The F2F cohort consisted of 97 individuals comprising primarily of non-Hispanic White women (mean age = 57 years, SD ± 14 years) with diagnoses including persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (19%), Meniere's disease (15%), and vestibular neuritis (13%). Most participants were diagnosed by an otolaryngologist (65%) and attended F2F meetings monthly or less frequently (78%). The OSC group comprised of 551 individuals, primarily of non-Hispanic White women, but was younger in age (mean age = 50 years, SD ± 13 years). OSC participants notably engaged more, with 36% participating on a daily basis and 32% multiple times a week. F2F participants were older (mean age 57 years vs 50 years, P < .001) and more commonly referred by medical professionals (22% F2F vs 6% OSC, P < .001). Both groups had similar achieved goals, including hearing from others with the same diagnosis (84% vs 89%, P > .05) and similar impact on medical decision-making (75% vs 78%, P > .05). More F2F participants reported increased development of coping skills (79% F2F vs 69% OSC, P = .037). OSC participants typically found the group via an online search (75%), compared to 51% for F2F. OSC participants had higher daily engagement (36%) compared to F2F (1%).

CONCLUSION:

F2F users are older and more commonly referred by medical professionals. Despite less frequent engagement, F2F participants reported similar influences on achieved goals, medical decision-making, and impact on psychosocial benefits. These findings highlight the importance of both F2F and OSC support groups for individuals with vestibular disorders.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupos de Autoayuda / Enfermedades Vestibulares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Grupos de Autoayuda / Enfermedades Vestibulares Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos