Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Retrospective analysis of radiological investigation of surgically excised head and neck lipomas.
Schranz, Amy L; Riordan, Fiona; Dolan, Roisin; Lawlor, Catriona; Morrison, Colin; O'Toole, Gary; Killeen, Ronan; McNeill, Graeme; O'Donohoe, Rory; Moran, Tom; O'Duffy, Fergal.
Afiliación
  • Schranz AL; Graduate Entry Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Riordan F; Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Dolan R; Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Lawlor C; Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Morrison C; Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Toole G; Orthopaedics Department, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Killeen R; Radiology Department, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • McNeill G; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Donohoe R; Radiology Department, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Moran T; School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • O'Duffy F; Radiology Department, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740577
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Differentiating benign lipomas from malignant causes is challenging and preoperative investigative guidelines are not well-defined. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively identify cases of head and neck lipomas that were surgically resected over a 5-year period and to identify the radiological modality chosen and features discussed in the final report. Multidisciplinary outcomes and pathology reports were examined with a view to identifying high risk features of a lipoma to aid in future risk stratification.

METHODS:

Retrospective chart review of pathology characteristics, radiological features (modality, size, calcifications, septations, globular/nodular foci), multidisciplinary discussion and history of presenting complaint was performed.

RESULTS:

Two liposarcomas and 138 lipomas were identified. Twenty-two percent of all lipomas received radiological investigation. Twenty-two percent of imaging referrals were possibly inappropriate. Furthermore, radiological features suggestive of malignancy were not present in the final radiology report, X2 = 28.8, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSION:

As expected, the incidence of liposarcoma is low. There is limited awareness of radiology referral guidelines superimposed with a tendency to over-investigate lipomas. Furthermore, radiological features suggestive of malignancy were inconsistently reported on and not documented in multidisciplinary discussions. Therefore, we propose a multidisciplinary checklist for referring physicians and radiologists to aid in diagnostic work-up.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol Asunto de la revista: OTORRINOLARINGOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Irlanda