[Health economic evaluation of rehabilitative short-term care : Analysis of the costs of geriatric patients with and without rehabilitative short-term care after inpatient hospital stay]. / Gesundheitsökonomische Evaluation einer rehabilitativen Kurzzeitpflege : Ermittlung der Kosten von geriatrischen Patienten mit und ohne rehabilitative Kurzzeitpflege nach stationärem Krankenhausaufenthalt.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Geriatric patients requiring rehabilitation and admitted to short-term care after an acute inpatient hospital stay seldom receive rehabilitative services later. Rehabilitative short-term care (REKUP) supplements short-term care with rehabilitative measures, aiming to prevent functional restrictions and long-term care. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To conduct a cost and cost-effectiveness analyses of REKUP and provide data for a nationwide rollout. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A non-randomized controlled prospective study was carried out. The intervention group (IG) was paired 12 with a control group (KG), resulting in the formation of three collectives with follow-up periods of either 30, 90 or 180 days (each with IG and KG). Using administrative claims data from the AOK Baden-Württemberg, the mean total costs from the perspective of the health insurance were calculated. A potential impact of the intervention on costs was analyzed using the difference in differences approach. RESULTS: The analysis comprised 129 patients (IG 43; KG 86). During the follow-up periods, the IG presented higher rates of rehabilitation and lower rates of long-term care and mortality. Regarding costs, no statistically significant differences were found between the IG and KG in any of the three collectives. For nursing care and medication costs, costs were significantly higher in the follow-up period for the KG, whereas costs for rehabilitation were significantly higher for the IG (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Patients receiving REKUP utilize rehabilitation services more often and have a lower likelihood of requiring nursing care or dying with no statistically significant differences in costs. There are potential advantages of REKUP in the target population, which warrant further investigation due to methodological limitations.