Doctoral graduates' attitudes toward scholarly work and Institutional Review Board and Quality Improvement Committee education and submission processes: A pilot study.
Nurs Outlook
; 72(4): 102179, 2024.
Article
en En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-38754269
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND:
Educators are challenged to find better ways to prepare doctoral nursing students to conduct scholarly work involving human subjects.PURPOSE:
To better understand doctoral nursing students' attitudes toward programmatic scholarly work and Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Quality Improvement Committee (QIC) education and submission processes.METHODS:
Recent Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) and Philosophy of Nursing (PhD) graduates were recruited using convenience sampling techniques to participate in this cross-sectional, descriptive, mixed-methods pilot study. Data were collected using two researcher-developed instruments.DISCUSSION:
Nineteen doctoral nursing students participated in this study. Students most often used a quantitative approach with health care providers to complete their scholarly work requirements. Both PhD and DNP participants were overall satisfied with the IRB/QIC content in the curricula and the submission process. Four themes were identified (a) Efficiency, (b) Collaboration, (c) Faculty Mentorship, and (d) Areas for Improvement.CONCLUSION:
Findings from this pilot study may be used to enhance IRB/QIC processes through revision of administrative processes and student education.Palabras clave
Texto completo:
1
Colección:
01-internacional
Banco de datos:
MEDLINE
Asunto principal:
Educación de Postgrado en Enfermería
/
Mejoramiento de la Calidad
Límite:
Adult
/
Female
/
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
Nurs Outlook
Año:
2024
Tipo del documento:
Article