Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Training in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review of training modalities and objective and subjective assessment methods.
Rahimi, A Masie; Uluç, Ezgi; Hardon, Sem F; Bonjer, H Jaap; van der Peet, Donald L; Daams, Freek.
Afiliación
  • Rahimi AM; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Tafelbergweg 47, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.rahimi@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Uluç E; Amsterdam Skills Centre for Health Sciences, Tafelbergweg 47, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.rahimi@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Hardon SF; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.rahimi@amsterdamumc.nl.
  • Bonjer HJ; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Tafelbergweg 47, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van der Peet DL; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Tafelbergweg 47, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Daams F; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Tafelbergweg 47, 1105 BD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc ; 38(7): 3547-3555, 2024 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38814347
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The variety of robotic surgery systems, training modalities, and assessment tools within robotic surgery training is extensive. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively overview different training modalities and assessment methods for teaching and assessing surgical skills in robotic surgery, with a specific focus on comparing objective and subjective assessment methods.

METHODS:

A systematic review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. The electronic databases Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from inception until February 1, 2022. Included studies consisted of robotic-assisted surgery training (e.g., box training, virtual reality training, cadaver training and animal tissue training) with an assessment method (objective or subjective), such as assessment forms, virtual reality scores, peer-to-peer feedback or time recording.

RESULTS:

The search identified 1591 studies. After abstract screening and full-texts examination, 209 studies were identified that focused on robotic surgery training and included an assessment tool. The majority of the studies utilized the da Vinci Surgical System, with dry lab training being the most common approach, followed by the da Vinci Surgical Skills Simulator. The most frequently used assessment methods included simulator scoring system (e.g., dVSS score), and assessment forms (e.g., GEARS and OSATS).

CONCLUSION:

This systematic review provides an overview of training modalities and assessment methods in robotic-assisted surgery. Dry lab training on the da Vinci Surgical System and training on the da Vinci Skills Simulator are the predominant approaches. However, focused training on tissue handling, manipulation, and force interaction is lacking, despite the absence of haptic feedback. Future research should focus on developing universal objective assessment and feedback methods to address these limitations as the field continues to evolve.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Competencia Clínica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Competencia Clínica / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados Límite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Revista: Surg Endosc Asunto de la revista: DIAGNOSTICO POR IMAGEM / GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos