Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
OPTIMAL: Titration of anti-IL5 biologics in severe asthma - An open label randomised controlled trial.
Soendergaard, Marianne Baastrup; Bjerrum, Anne-Sofie; Rasmussen, Linda Makowska; Lock-Johansson, Sofie; Hilberg, Ole; Hansen, Susanne; von Bulow, Anna; Porsbjerg, Celeste.
Afiliación
  • Soendergaard MB; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark marianne.baastrup.soendergaard@regionh.dk.
  • Bjerrum AS; Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
  • Rasmussen LM; Allergy Clinic, Gentofte University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark.
  • Lock-Johansson S; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • Hilberg O; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sygehus Lillebaelt - Vejle Sygehus, Vejle, Denmark.
  • Hansen S; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • von Bulow A; Centre for Clinical Research and Prevention, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Porsbjerg C; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital - Bispebjerg, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Eur Respir J ; 2024 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38843910
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Anti-interleukin 5 (anti-IL5) biologics effectively reduce exacerbations and the need for maintenance oral corticosteroids (mOCS) in severe eosinophilic asthma. However, it is unknown how long anti-IL5 treatment should be continued. Data from clinical trials indicate a gradual but variable loss of control after treatment cessation. In this pilot study of titration, we evaluated a dose-titration algorithm in patients who had achieved clinical control on an anti-IL5 biologic.

METHODS:

In this open-label randomised controlled trial conducted over 52 weeks, patients with clinical control (no exacerbations or mOCS) on anti-IL5 treatment were randomised to continue with unchanged intervals or have dosing intervals adjusted according to a titration algorithm that gradually extended dosing intervals and reduced them again at signs of loss of disease control. The OPTIMAL algorithm was designed to down-titrate dosing until signs of loss of control, to enable assessment of the longest dosing interval possible.

RESULTS:

Among 73 patients enrolled, 37 patients were randomised to the OPTIMAL titration arm; 78% of patients tolerated down-titration of treatment. Compared to the control arm, the OPTIMAL arm tended to have more exacerbations during the study (32% versus 17% (p=0.13)). There were no severe adverse events related to titration, and lung function and symptoms scores remained stable and comparable in both study arms throughout.

CONCLUSIONS:

This study serves as a proof-of-concept for titration of anti-IL5 biologics in patients with severe asthma with clinical control on treatment, and the OPTIMAL algorithm provides a potential framework for individualising dosing intervals in the future.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur Respir J Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Dinamarca