Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Extent and Boundaries of Lymph Node Stations During Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: A Survey Among Dutch Esophageal Surgeons.
Ketel, M H M; van der Aa, D C; Henckens, S P G; Rosman, C; van Berge Henegouwen, M I; Klarenbeek, B R; Gisbertz, S S.
Afiliación
  • Ketel MHM; Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
  • van der Aa DC; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Henckens SPG; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Rosman C; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • van Berge Henegouwen MI; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Klarenbeek BR; Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Gisbertz SS; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(9): 5683-5696, 2024 Sep.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38862837
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The optimal extent of lymph node dissection (LND) and the anatomic boundaries per lymph node station (LNS) during minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for esophageal cancer remain a topic of debate. This study investigated the opinion of Dutch esophageal cancer surgeons on their routine LND extent and anatomic boundaries per LNS during MIE.

METHODS:

In April 2023, an English web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted. In each of the 15 Dutch hospitals performing MIE, two MIE surgeons were asked to participate. The routine LND extent (quantity, specific LNS) for distal esophageal adenocarcinoma, (dis)agreement with the TIGER definition, and anatomic boundaries for each LNS in six directions were queried.

RESULTS:

The survey was completed by 24 Dutch MIE surgeons (80% response rate). Consensus on the routine LND extent ( ≥ 85% of the participating surgeons) included the left and right paracardial, left gastric artery, celiac trunk, proximal splenic artery, common hepatic artery, subcarinal middle mediastinal paraoesophageal, lower mediastinal paraoesophageal, pulmonary ligament, and upper mediastinal paraoesophageal LNSs. Other LNSs were not widely considered routine. Although, certain anatomic boundaries were consistent among the surgeons, the majority varied, even when they agreed on the TIGER definition.

CONCLUSION:

Significant variations in surgical practice among Dutch esophageal surgeons regarding their routine extent of LND and anatomic boundaries of LNSs during MIE were demonstrated. Variation may have an impact on clinical outcomes, hampering uniform treatment strategies and hindering comparison of performance assessments. This study highlighted the need for an international follow-up study toward one uniform defined LND during MIE for esophageal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Cirujanos / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático / Ganglios Linfáticos Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Esofágicas / Esofagectomía / Cirujanos / Escisión del Ganglio Linfático / Ganglios Linfáticos Límite: Female / Humans País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ann Surg Oncol Asunto de la revista: NEOPLASIAS Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos