Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study.
Bocchino, Alessia Celeste; Fernández-Pascual, Esaú; Toribio-Vázquez, Carlos; Manfredi, Celeste; Urdaneta, Guillermo; Balmori, Carlos; Lledó, Enrique; Martínez-Ballesteros, Claudio; Cocci, Andrea; Mondaini, Nicola; Martínez-Salamanca, Juan Ignacio.
Afiliación
  • Bocchino AC; Department of Urology, University of Cagliari, Santissima Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy.
  • Fernández-Pascual E; LYX Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain. esau.fdez@gmail.com.
  • Toribio-Vázquez C; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain. esau.fdez@gmail.com.
  • Manfredi C; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • Urdaneta G; Urology Unit, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.
  • Balmori C; LYX Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lledó E; LYX Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez-Ballesteros C; LYX Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cocci A; Department of Urology, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
  • Mondaini N; LYX Institute of Urology, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
  • Martínez-Salamanca JI; Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain.
Int J Impot Res ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886594
ABSTRACT
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare efficacy and safety of two different Disposable circumcision suture devices (DCSDs). A prospective comparative non-randomized multicenter study was performed between November 2019 and February 2023. Patients underwent circumcision using a DCSD (CircCurerTM or the ZSR® device) according to the surgeon preference and device availability. A total of 378 patients were circumcised; 184 using CircCurerTM and 194 patients using ZSR®. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed. CircCurer and ZSR Groups showed similar rates of operative time (7.7 ±2.1 vs 7.3 ±2.0 min), surgical site infection (1.1% Vs 1.5%), edema (13% Vs 8.2%), hematomas (2.7% Vs 1.1%), and postoperative pain (2.5 Vs 2.0 points). ZSR Group had a significantly higher rate of clip fallout (62.9% Vs 38%, p < 0.001). At 2 months, patients of both groups reported a median satisfaction of 9 (8-9) points. Main limitation consist in non-randomized study. DCSDs seem to be effective and safe, with short operative times, uncommon and mild complications, and high patient satisfaction. ZSR® device has a higher rate of spontaneous staple dropout.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Impot Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Int J Impot Res Asunto de la revista: MEDICINA REPRODUTIVA / UROLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia