Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring and increasing rates of self-isolation in the context of COVID-19: a systematic review with narrative synthesis.
Smith, L E; Martin, A F; Brooks, S K; Davies, R; Stein, M V; Amlôt, R; Marteau, T M; Rubin, G J.
Afiliación
  • Smith LE; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom; UK Health Security Agency, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, United Kingdom. Electronic address: louise.e.smi
  • Martin AF; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom.
  • Brooks SK; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom.
  • Davies R; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom.
  • Stein MV; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; Department of Psychology, King's College London, United Kingdom.
  • Amlôt R; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; UK Health Security Agency, Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, United Kingdom.
  • Marteau TM; University of Cambridge, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, United Kingdom.
  • Rubin GJ; King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, United Kingdom; NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response, United Kingdom.
Public Health ; 2024 Jun 28.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972797
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

This study aimed to investigate (1) definitions of self-isolation used during the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) measures used to quantify adherence and their reliability, validity, and acceptability; (3) rates of self-isolation adherence; and (4) factors associated with adherence. STUDY

DESIGN:

This was a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines (PROSPERO record CRD42022377820).

METHODS:

MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, PsyArXiv, medRxiv, and grey literature sources were searched (1 January 2020 to 13 December 2022) using terms related to COVID-19, isolation, and adherence. Studies were included if they contained original, quantitative data of self-isolation adherence during the COVID-19 pandemic. We extracted definitions of self-isolation, measures used to quantify adherence, adherence rates, and factors associated with adherence.

RESULTS:

We included 45 studies. Self-isolation was inconsistently defined. Four studies did not use self-report measures. Of 41 studies using self-report, one reported reliability; another gave indirect evidence for the lack of validity of the measure. Rates of adherence to self-isolation for studies with only some concerns of bias were 51%-86% for COVID-19 cases, 78%-94% for contacts, and 16% for people with COVID-19-like symptoms. There was little evidence that self-isolation adherence was associated with sociodemographic or psychological factors.

CONCLUSIONS:

There was no consensus in defining, operationalising, or measuring self-isolation, resulting in significant risk of bias in included studies. Future definitions of self-isolation should state behaviours to be enacted and duration. People recommended to self-isolate should be given support. Public health campaigns should aim to increase perceived effectiveness of self-isolation and promote accurate information about susceptibility to infection.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Public Health Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article