Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG as a probiotic for preterm infants: a strain specific systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ananthan, Anitha; Balasubramanian, Haribalakrishna; Rath, Chandra; Muthusamy, Saravanan; Rao, Shripada; Patole, Sanjay.
Afiliación
  • Ananthan A; Department of Neonatology, Seth GS Medical College and King Edward Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India. ani.gem81@gmail.com.
  • Balasubramanian H; Department of Neonatology, Surya Mother and Child Care Hospital, Mumbai, India.
  • Rath C; Department of Neonatology, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Muthusamy S; Department of Neonatology, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Rao S; Department of Neonatology, Joondalup Health Campus, Perth, WA, Australia.
  • Patole S; School of Medicine, University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Eur J Clin Nutr ; 2024 Jul 26.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39060543
ABSTRACT
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG) is a widely used and extensively researched probiotic. Probiotic effects are considered to be strain specific. We aimed to comprehensively assess the strain-specific effects of LGG in preterm infants. A systematic review of RCTs and non-RCTs to evaluate the effect of LGG in preterm infants. We followed the Cochrane methodology, and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement for conducting and reporting this review. We searched the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL databases till December 2023. The review was registered in PROSPERO 2022 CRD42022324933. Meta-analysis of data from RCTs that used LGG as the sole probiotic showed significantly lower risk of NEC ≥Stage II [5 RCTs, n = 851, RR0.50 (95% CI 0.26, 0.93), P = 0.03] in the LGG group. There was no significant difference in the risk of LOS [7 RCTs, n = 1037, RR1.08 (95% CI 0.84, 1.39), P = 0.55], mortality [3 RCTs, n = 207, RR 0.99 (95% CI 0.42, 2.33), P = 0.99], time to reach full feeds [2 RCTs, n = 19, SMD = 0.11 days (95% CI -0.22, 0.45), P = 0.51] and duration of hospital stay [3 RCTs, n = 293, SMD -0.14 days (95% CI -0.37 to 0.09), P = 0.23]. Meta-analysis of data from non-RCTs showed no significant effect of LGG on NEC, LOS, and mortality. RCTs showed beneficial effects of LGG when used as the sole probiotic in reducing the risk of NEC, whereas observational studies did not. Strain-specific systematic review of LGG provides important data for guiding research and clinical practice.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Clin Nutr Asunto de la revista: CIENCIAS DA NUTRICAO Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: India