Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Aortic Valve Replacement in the Failing Left Ventricle: Worthwhile?
Kalyanasundaram, Asanish; Vinholo, Thais Faggion; Zafar, Mohammad A; Anis, Osama; Charilaou, Paris; Ziganshin, Bulat; Elefteriades, John A.
Afiliación
  • Kalyanasundaram A; Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
  • Vinholo TF; Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
  • Zafar MA; Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
  • Anis O; Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
  • Charilaou P; Saint Peter's University Hospital, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA.
  • Ziganshin B; Aortic Institute at Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.
  • Elefteriades JA; Department of Cardiovascular and Endovascular Surgery, Kazan State Medical University, 420012 Kazan, Russia.
Rev Cardiovasc Med ; 23(7): 223, 2022 Jul.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39076903
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

According to the 2020 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines, the aortic valve should be replaced in the setting of severe aortic stenosis or regurgitation, independent of left ventricular function (even for EF < 55%). However, in clinical practice, especially in a very low EF range, surgeons may avoid surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) because of concern over operative risk. This study examines outcomes of patients with EF ≤ 35% undergoing SAVR.

Methods:

From 2004 to 2019, 895 patients underwent SAVR for aortic stenosis (AS) and/or regurgitation (AR) by a single surgeon at our institution. From among these, 40 patients (4.47%) had an ejection fraction (EF) of 35% or less, forming the study group. Intra-aortic balloon pump was placed intraoperatively prophylactically pre-bypass in 18 out of the 40. Preoperative and post-operative echocardiograms were compared to determine changes in ejection fraction. Mid-term survival was assessed.

Results:

16 patients presented with AS, 20 with AR, and 4 with a combination of AS and AR. Hospital survival was 97.5% (one patient death). The average ejection fraction progressively improved over time from 26% initially to 46% mid-term with mean follow-up of 43 months (0.1-140.7). Remarkably, five-year survival was comparable between the study group and an age- and gender-matched general population (p = 0.834). Downward trends in LV end-diastolic diameter and end-systolic diameter were seen. The former achieved statistical significance (6.0 cm to 5.3 cm; p = 0.0046), while the latter fell slightly short (4.8 cm to 4.1 cm; p = 0.056). Patients in whom an IABP was used had lower EFs than those without IABP (range 10-35, mean 23% vs. 15-35%, mean 27.6%). The EFs of the three subgroups improved significantly postoperatively (p < 0.001 for AS, p = 0.002 for AR, and p = 0.046 for AS and AR).

Conclusions:

Surgical AVR can be done safely in patients with a failing LV with EF ≤ 35%. Significant improvements in the ejection fraction are seen over time. We believe there is a role for prophylactic pre-bypass IABP. Five-year survival is normalized. Surgeons should not hesitate to perform AVR in these highly jeopardized patients.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rev Cardiovasc Med Asunto de la revista: ANGIOLOGIA / CARDIOLOGIA Año: 2022 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos