Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Addressing Retinopathy of Prematurity in Rwanda.
Alder, Connor J; Mutangana, Francis; Phillips, Victoria; Becker, Edmund R; Fleming, Neil S; Isenberg, Sherwin J; Lambert, Scott R; Frank, Tahvi D.
Afiliación
  • Alder CJ; College of Life Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA.
  • Mutangana F; Department of Ophthalmology, King Faisal Hospital, Kigali, Rwanda.
  • Phillips V; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Becker ER; Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
  • Fleming NS; Robbins Institute for Health Policy & Leadership, Hankamer School of Business, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
  • Isenberg SJ; Department of Ophthalmology, Stein Eye Institute, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
  • Lambert SR; Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA.
  • Frank TD; Department of Ophthalmology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Ophthalmic Epidemiol ; : 1-9, 2024 Aug 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39146466
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

With the expansion of neonatal care in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), an increasing number of premature babies are at risk to develop retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Previous studies have quantified the cost-effectiveness of addressing ROP in middle-income countries, but few have focused on SSA. This study estimates the cost of a national program for ROP screening and anti-VEGF injection treatment in Rwanda compared to the status quo.

METHODS:

Medical cost data were collected from King Faisal Hospital in Rwanda (July 2022). Societal burden of vision loss included lost productivity and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Published data on epidemiology and natural history of ROP were used to estimate burden and sequelae of ROP in Rwanda. Cost of a national program for screening and treating a one-year birth cohort was compared to the status quo using a decision analysis model.

RESULTS:

Cost of ROP screening and treatment was $738 per infant. The estimated equipment cost necessary for the startup of a national program was $58,667. We projected that a national program could avert 257 cases of blindness in the cohort and increase QALYs compared to the status quo. Screening and treatment for ROP would save an estimated $270,000 for the birth cohort from reductions in lost productivity.

CONCLUSION:

The cost of screening and anti-VEGF treatment for ROP is substantially less than the indirect cost of vision loss due to ROP. Allocating additional funding towards expansion of ROP screening and treatment is cost-saving from a societal perspective compared to current practice.
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Ophthalmic Epidemiol Asunto de la revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / OFTALMOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos