Limitations of life-sustaining treatments in intensive care units in Croatia: a multicenter retrospective study.

AIM: In order to gain insight into the current prevailing practices regarding the limitation of life-sustaining treatment in intensive care units (ICUs) in Croatia, we assessed the frequency of limitation and provision of certain treatment modalities, as well as the associated patient and ICU-related factors. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted in 17 ICUs in Croatia. We reviewed the medical records of patients deceased in 2017 and extracted data on demographic, clinical, and health care variables. A logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine the associations between these variables and treatment modalities. RESULTS: The study enrolled 1095 patients (55% male; mean age 69.9±13.7). Analgesia and sedation were discontinued before the patient's death in 23% and 34% of the cases, respectively. Patients older than 71 years were less often mechanically ventilated (P<0.001), and less frequently received inotropes and vasoactive therapy (P=0.002) than younger patients. Patients hospitalized in the ICU for less than 7 days less frequently had discontinuation of mechanical ventilation and inotropes and vasoactive therapy than patients hospitalized for 8 days and longer (P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that ICU type was a crucial determinant, with multidisciplinary and surgical ICUs being associated with higher odds of intubation, mechanical ventilation, vasoactive and inotropic therapy, analgesia, and sedation. CONCLUSION: Older patients and those diagnosed with stroke and intracranial hemorrhage received fewer therapeutic modalities. All the observed treatment modalities were more frequently discontinued in patients who were hospitalized in the ICU for a prolonged time.

Position statement of the Brazilian Palliative Care Academy on withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining interventions in the context of palliative care.

The issue of withrawing and withholding life-sustaining interventions is an important source of controversy among healthcare professionals caring for patients with serious illnesses. Misguided decisions, both in terms of the introduction/maintenance and the withdrawal/withholding of these measures, represent a source of avoidable suffering for patients, their loved ones, and healthcare professionals. This document represents the position statement of the Bioethics Committee of the Brazilian Palliative Care Academy on this issue and establishes seven principles to guide, from a bioethical perspective, the approach to situations related to this topic in the context of palliative care in Brazil. The position statement establishes the equivalence between the withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining interventions and the inadequacy related to initiating or maintaining such measures in contexts where they are in disagreement with the values and care goals defined together with patients and their families. Additionally, the position statement distinguishes strictly futile treatments from potentially inappropriate treatments and elucidates their critical implications for the appropriateness of the medical decision-making process in this context. Finally, we address the issue of conscientious objection and its limits, determine that the ethical commitment to the relief of suffering should not be influenced by the decision to employ or not employ life-sustaining interventions and warn against the use of language that causes patients/families to believe that only one of the available options related to the use or nonuse of these interventions will enable the relief of suffering.

Knowledge and Skill Retention in First-Year MBBS Students After Basic Life Support Training: A One-Year Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: The Indian National Medical Council has incorporated the Basic Life Support (BLS) course in the foundation course of the undergraduate (MBBS) medical curriculum. However, medical teachers raise concerns about how training would affect the retention of Basic Life Support (BLS) abilities in the longer run. So, the current study assesses the knowledge and retention of BLS skills among first-year MBBS students over one year. METHODS: We included one hundred first-year MBBS students in our study who were trained for BLS, including theory, demonstrations and hands-on training using mannequins. Theoretical knowledge was assessed using pre-test and post-test questionnaires. At the same time, the skills were evaluated using Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) scores before, just after the training session, and again after one month, six months, and one year. Course feedback was also taken from the students after completing the sessions. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between pre-and post-test knowledge scores, indicating that training improved their knowledge. (p < 0.001) There was also a statistically significant difference between pre-and post-test skills using DOPS (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the score when DOPS was conducted at one month, but a significant decrease in their skills was seen at six months and one year when compared with the Post Skill Score. (P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The first-year medical students' knowledge and skills were enhanced by BLS training coupled with practical sessions. Such waning skills necessitate repeating the training at periodic intervals to reinform retention of skills acquired during BLS training.

Impact of the life-sustaining treatment decision act on organ donation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in South Korea: a multi-centre retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The demand for organ transplants, both globally and in South Korea, substantially exceeds the supply, a situation that might have been aggravated by the enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision Act (LSTDA) in February 2018. This legislation may influence emergency medical procedures and the availability of organs from brain-dead donors. This study aimed to assess LSTDA's impact, introduced in February 2018, on organ donation status in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients in a metropolitan city and identified related factors. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a regional cardiac arrest registry. This study included patients aged 16 or older with cardiac arrest and a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 5 from January 2015 to December 2022. The exclusion criteria were CPC scores of 1-4, patients under 16 years, and patients declared dead or transferred from emergency departments. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse factors affecting organ donation. RESULTS: Of the 751 patients included in this study, 47 were organ donors, with a median age of 47 years. Before the LSTDA, there were 30 organ donations, which declined to 17 after its implementation. In the organ donation group, the causes of cardiac arrest included medical (34%), hanging (46.8%), and trauma (19.2%). The adjusted odds ratio for organ donation before the LSTDA implementation was 6.12 (95% CI 3.09-12.12), with non-medical aetiology as associated factors. CONCLUSION: The enactment of the LSTDA in 2018 in South Korea may be linked to reduced organ donations among patients with OHCA, underscoring the need to re-evaluate the medical and legal aspects of organ donation, especially considering end-of-life care decisions.

Pediatric Life Support in Prehospital Emergency Medicine: An Empirical Investigation in the Context of Taiwan's Critical Shortage of Pediatric Emergency Specialists.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to facilitate parental identification of designated emergency facilities for expeditious pediatric care within the framework of Taiwan's newly implemented "regional joint defense" approach to pediatric emergency services. The research seeks to elucidate the mechanisms by which this novel system can enhance timely access to appropriate emergency care for children, potentially improving health outcomes and resource utilization in acute pediatric situations. METHODS: Factor analysis (FA) and triangular entropy matrix (TEM) analyzed the appearance, breathing and skin of pediatric assessment triangle (ABC of PAT), three types of prehospital pediatric emergence condition (PPEC), five levels of Taiwan's pediatric emergency triage (TPET), and applied the social learning theory (SLT) in educational doctrine, using experts' weighted questionnaires. RESULTS: Firstly, to address deficiencies in Taiwan's pediatric prehospital emergency medicine (PEM) system, integrating emergency medical knowledge (EMK) and pediatric life support (PLS) into medical education, staff training, and the national handbook for new parents is crucial. This equips parents to manage children's illnesses and prevent emergencies. Then, in life-threatening situations, immediate emergency room (ER) transport is vital for symptoms like whitish or purple lips, cold limbs, mottled skin, cold sweat, convulsions, dyspnea, chest dimples, weak consciousness, and oxygen saturation below 94%. Finally, for non-life-threatening emergencies, seek medical evaluation if symptoms include wheezing, chest tightness, chest pain, persistent high fever over 39 degrees with convulsions, chills, cold sweats, not eating or urinating for over 12 hours, or fever lasting more than 48 hours. CONCLUSION: Parents must remain calm and provide their baby with a sense of security while observing the development of physical symptoms. This approach enables them to effectively determine the most appropriate time to take their children to the emergency room, thereby avoiding life-threatening emergencies. Prompt and proper measures and treatments not only alleviate various discomforts caused by illness or medical emergencies but also reduce systemic distress, life-threatening situations, and unfortunate incidents before hospitalization.

Withdrawing Life Support After Attempted Suicide: A Case Study and Review of Ethical Considerations.

Ethical questions surrounding withdrawal of life support can be complex. When life support therapies are the result of a suicide attempt, the potential ethical issues take on another dimension. Duties and principles that normally guide clinicians' actions as caregivers may not apply as easily. We present a case of attempted suicide in which decisions surrounding withdrawal of life support provoked conflict between a patient's family and the medical team caring for him. We highlight the major unresolved philosophical questions and contradictory normative values about suicide that underlie this conflict. Finally, we show how these considerations were practically applied to this particular case.

Validation of a checklist to facilitate serious illness conversations in adult emergency in China: a single-centre pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Advances in emergency and critical care have improved outcomes, but gaps in communication and decision-making persist, especially in the emergency department (ED), prompting the development of a checklist to aid in serious illness conversations (SIC) in China. METHODS: This was a single-centre prospective interventional study on the quality improvement of SIC for life-sustaining treatment (LST). The study recruited patients consecutively for both its observational baseline and interventional stages until its conclusion. Eligible participants were adults over 18 years old admitted to the Emergency Intensive Care Unit (EICU) of a tertiary teaching hospital, possessing full decisional capacity or having a legal proxy. Exclusions were made for pregnant women, patients deceased upon arrival, those who refused participation, and individuals with incomplete data for analysis. First, a two-round Delphi process was organized to identify major elements and generate a standard process through a checklist. Subsequently, the efficacy of SIC in adult patients admitted to the EICU was compared using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) score before (baseline group) and after (intervention group) implementing the checklist. RESULTS: The study participants presented with the most common comorbidities, such as diabetes, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular disease, moderate-to-severe renal disease, congestive heart failure, and chronic pulmonary disease. The median Charlson Index did not differ between the baseline and intervention cohorts. The median length of hospital stay was 11.0 days, and 82.9% of patients survived until hospital discharge. The total DCS score was lower in the intervention group than in the baseline group. Three subscales, including the informed, values clarity, and support subscales, demonstrated significant differences between the intervention and baseline groups. Fewer intervention group patients agreed with and changed their minds about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) compared to the baseline group. CONCLUSION: The use of a SIC checklist in the EICU reduced the DCS score by increasing medical information disclosure, patient value awareness, and decision-making support.

End-of-life practices in Hong Kong intensive care units: results from the Ethicus-2 study.

INTRODUCTION: The need for end-of-life care is common in intensive care units (ICUs). Although guidelines exist, little is known about actual end-of-life care practices in Hong Kong ICUs. The study aim was to provide a detailed description of these practices. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre observational sub-analysis of the Ethicus-2 study explored end-of-life practices in eight participating Hong Kong ICUs. Consecutive adult ICU patients admitted during a 6-month period with life-sustaining treatment (LST) limitation or death were included. Follow-up continued until death or 2 months from the initial decision to limit LST. RESULTS: Of 4922 screened patients, 548 (11.1%) had LST limitation (withholding or withdrawal) or died (failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation/brain death). Life-sustaining treatment limitation occurred in 455 (83.0%) patients: 353 (77.6%) had decisions to withhold LST and 102 (22.4%) had decisions to withdraw LST. Of those who died without LST limitation, 80 (86.0%) had failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 13 (14.0%) were declared brain dead. Discussions of LST limitation were initiated by ICU physicians in most (86.2%) cases. Shared decision-making between ICU physicians and families was the predominant model; only 6.0% of patients retained decision-making capacity. Primary medical reasons for LST limitation were unresponsiveness to maximal therapy (49.2%) and multiorgan failure (17.1%). The most important consideration for decision-making was the patient's best interest (81.5%). CONCLUSION: Life-sustaining treatment limitations are common in Hong Kong ICUs; shared decision-making between physicians and families in the patient's best interest is the predominant model. Loss of decision-making capacity is common at the end of life. Patients should be encouraged to communicate end-of-life treatment preferences to family members/surrogates, or through advance directives.

Factors Associated with Patient-Caregiver Concordance about Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences among Advanced Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

OBJECTIVES: Concordance of preferences for end-of-life care regarding patients between patients with advanced cancer and family caregivers can improve the likelihood of honoring dying patients' wishes. However, there is a dearth of knowledge in mainland China. The purpose of this study was to examine patient-family caregiver concordance about patients' life-sustaining treatment preferences and associated factors among patients with advanced cancer in China. METHODS: From September 2019 to December 2021, a convenience sample of 406 dyads of advanced cancer patient-family caregiver were recruited from 2 tertiary hospitals in Wuhan, China. Participants completed a questionnaire about patient's preferences for life-sustaining treatment, respectively. The concordance was assessed by percent agreement and kappa coefficients. Associated factors were identified by univariate analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: The average concordance rate on the preferences for life-sustaining treatment was 56.1%, ranging from 52.9% to 59.3%. Factors associated with a higher level of patient-family caregiver concordance were following: patients who were married, whose educational levels were at college or above, who had not been informed of diagnosis by a physician, who had been informed of the effects and side effects of related drugs by a physician, and who cared for a seriously ill family member or friend and caregivers whose educational level were primary or below. CONCLUSIONS: The patient-family caregiver concordance about patients' life-sustaining treatment preferences among patients with advanced cancer was poor. Patients' and caregivers' understanding of life-sustaining treatment and its efficacy in end-of-life should be facilitated. Relevant conversation should be encouraged between patients and caregivers, thus providing value-concordant end-of-life care for patients with cancer. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Health professionals need to carry out advanced care planning in oncology departments on mainland China to encourage patients and caregivers to discuss patients' end-of-life care preferences. Facilitating patients' and caregivers' understanding of life-sustaining treatment preferences may help improve the patient-caregiver concordance on life-sustaining treatment preferences among patients with advanced cancer.

Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process.

BACKGROUND: Health professionals had difficulty choosing the right time to discuss life-sustaining treatments (LSTs) since the Korean Act was passed in 2018. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to understand how patients decide to undergo LSTs in clinical practice and to compare the perceptions of these decisions among health professionals, patients, and families with suggestions to support the self-directed decisions of patients. RESEARCH DESIGN: A retrospective observational study with electronic medical records (EMRs) and a descriptive survey was used. METHODS: The data obtained from the EMRs included all adult patients who died in end-of-life care at a university hospital in 2021. We also conducted a survey of 214 health professionals and 100 patients and their families (CNUH IRB approval no. 2022-07-006). RESULTS: Based on the EMR data of 916 patients in end-of-life care, 78.4% signed do-not-attempt-resuscitation consents, 5.6% completed the documents for LSTs, and 10.2% completed both forms. LST decisions were mostly made by family members (81.5%). Most survey participants agreed that meaningless LSTs should be suspended, and the decision should be made by patients. Patients and family members (42-56%) and health professionals (56-58%) recommended discussing LST suspension when the patient is still conscious but with predicted deterioration of their condition. The suffering experienced by the patient was considered to be a priority by most patients (58%) and families (54%) during the decision-making process, while health professionals considered "the possibility of the patient's recovery" to be the highest priority (43-55%). CONCLUSIONS: There is still a significant discrepancy in the perceptions of LST decisions among health professionals, patients, and their families despite high awareness of the Act. This situation makes it challenging to implement the Act to ensure respect for the rights of patients to self-determination and dignified end-of-life. Further effort is needed to improve the awareness of LSTs and to clarify the ambiguity of document preparation timing.

Physicians' experiences and perceptions about withholding and withdrawal life-sustaining treatment in Chiang Mai University Hospital: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment in end-of-life patients is a challenging ethical issue faced by physicians. Understanding physicians' experiences and factors influencing their decisions can lead to improvement in end-of-life care. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the experiences of Thai physicians when making decisions regarding the withholding or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments in end-of-life situations. Additionally, the study aims to assess the consensus among physicians regarding the factors that influence these decisions and to explore the influence of families or surrogates on the decision-making process of physicians, utilizing case-based surveys. METHODS: A web-based survey was conducted among physicians practicing in Chiang Mai University Hospital (June - October 2022). RESULTS: Among 251 physicians (response rate 38.3%), most of the respondents (60.6%) reported that they experienced withholding or withdrawal treatment in end-of-life patients. Factors that influence their decision-making include patient's preferences (100%), prognosis (93.4%), patients' quality of life (92.8%), treatment burden (89.5%), and families' request (87.5%). For a chronic disease with comatose condition, the majority of the physicians (47%) chose to continue treatments, including cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). In contrast, only 2 physicians (0.8%) would do everything, in cases when families or surrogates insisted on stopping the treatment. This increased to 78.1% if the families insisted on continuing treatment. CONCLUSION: Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments are common in Thailand. The key factors influencing their decision-making process included patient's preferences and medical conditions and families' requests. Effective communication and early engagement in advanced care planning between physicians, patients, and families empower them to align treatment choices with personal values.

In adults with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia, lower vs. higher oxygenation targets increased days alive without life support.

SOURCE CITATION: Nielsen FM, Klitgaard TL, Siegemund M, et al; HOT-COVID Trial Group. Lower vs higher oxygenation target and days alive without life support in COVID-19: the HOT-COVID randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2024;331:1185-1194. 38501214.

Life-sustaining treatment decisions and family evaluations of end-of-life care for Veteran decedents in Department of Veterans Affairs nursing homes.

BACKGROUND: Modeled after the Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment program, the Veterans Health Administration (VA) implemented the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decisions Initiative to improve end-of-life outcomes by standardizing LST preference documentation for seriously ill Veterans. This study examined the associations between LST documentation and family evaluation of care in the final month of life for Veterans in VA nursing homes. METHODS: Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of data for decedents in VA nursing homes between July 1, 2018 and January 31, 2020 (N = 14,575). Regression modeling generated odds for key end-of-life outcomes and family ratings of care quality. RESULTS: LST preferences were documented for 12,928 (89%) of VA nursing home decedents. Contrary to our hypothesis, neither receipt of wanted medications and medical treatment (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63, 1.16) nor ratings of overall care in the last month of life (adjusted OR: 0.96, 95% CI 0.76, 1.22) differed significantly between those with and without completed LST templates in adjusted analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Among Community Living Center (CLC) decedents, 89% had documented LST preferences. No significant differences were observed in family ratings of care between Veterans with and without documentation of LST preferences. Interventions aimed at improving family ratings of end-of-life care quality in CLCs should not target LST documentation in isolation of other factors associated with higher family ratings of end-of-life care quality.

Insurance Type and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Therapy in Critically Injured Trauma Patients.

Importance: Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST) decisions for critically injured trauma patients are complicated and multifactorial, with potential for patients' insurance status to affect decision-making. Objectives: To determine if patient insurance type (private insurance, Medicaid, and uninsured) is associated with time to WLST in critically injured adults cared for at US trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective registry-based cohort study included reported data from level I and level II trauma centers in the US that participated in the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) registry. Participants included adult trauma patients who were injured between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2020, and required an intensive care unit stay. Patients were excluded if they died on arrival or in the emergency department or had a preexisting do not resuscitate directive. Analyses were performed on December 12, 2023. Exposures: Insurance type (private insurance, Medicaid, uninsured). Main Outcomes and Measures: An adjusted time-to-event analysis for association between insurance status and time to WLST was performed, with analyses accounting for clustering by hospital. Results: This study included 307 731 patients, of whom 160 809 (52.3%) had private insurance, 88 233 (28.6%) had Medicaid, and 58 689 (19.1%) were uninsured. The mean (SD) age was 40.2 (14.1) years, 232 994 (75.7%) were male, 59 551 (19.4%) were African American or Black patients, and 201 012 (65.3%) were White patients. In total, 12 962 patients (4.2%) underwent WLST during their admission. Patients who are uninsured were significantly more likely to undergo earlier WLST compared with those with private insurance (HR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.46-1.62) and Medicaid (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.39-1.55). This finding was robust to sensitivity analysis excluding patients who died within 48 hours of presentation and after accounting for nonwithdrawal death as a competing risk. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of US adult trauma patients who were critically injured, patients who were uninsured underwent earlier WLST compared with those with private or Medicaid insurance. Based on our findings, patient's ability to pay was may be associated with a shift in decision-making for WLST, suggesting the influence of socioeconomics on patient outcomes.

Perioperative Care of the Patient with Directives Limiting Life-Sustaining Treatments.

Like most complex aspects of procedural care, sound perioperative management of limits to life-sustaining medical therapy requires a multidisciplinary team-based approach bolstered by appropriate care management strategies. This article discusses the implications of care for the patient for whom limitations of life-sustaining care are in place and the roles and responsibilities of each provider in supporting quality procedural care compatible with patients' right to self-determination. The authors focus on the roles of the surgeon, preoperative clinic provider, anesthesiologist, and postoperative care consultants and discuss how the health care system and care pathways can support and improve adherence to best practices.

End-of-life Care in the Intensive Care Unit and Ethics of Withholding/Withdrawal of Life-sustaining Treatments.

The medical progress has produced improvements in critically ill patients' survival to early phases of life-threatening diseases, thus producing long intensive care stays and persisting disability, with uncertain long-term survival rates and quality of life. Thus, compassionate end-of-life care and the provision of palliative care, even overlapping with the most aggressive of curative intensive care unit (ICU) care has become crucial. Moreover, withdrawal or withholding of life-sustaining treatment may be adopted, allowing unavoidable deaths to occur, without prolonging agony or ICU stay. Our aim was to summarize the key element of end-of-life care in the ICU and the ethics of withholding/withdrawal life-sustaining treatments.

Crisis-ready educational skills of life support in newborns and adults' scenarios: the impact of simulation-based training on student proficiency.

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To assess the impact of multidisciplinary simulation training on the educational outcomes of medical students in the emergency care of adults and newborns and implement changes in the curriculum to master simulation scenarios more. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: To assess the differences in learning outcomes between medical students who study the same curriculum without simulation interventions and those who undergo multidisciplinary emergency care simulation training. A quasi-experimental approach was used to assign students to the Intervention Group or the Control Group. RESULTS: Results: According to individual criteria, the lowest scores in both groups were obtained for the stages that required the greatest accuracy and correct technique. After the appropriate cycle of initiation, the results in both groups improved significantly, but the results of students from the first group were significantly higher than those of students from the second group. Despite the absence of a significant difference in the average overall score for the skills, students in the first group significantly improved the accuracy and correctness of the criteria that assess the technical aspects of performance, while students in the second group mainly improved the quality of the descriptive and communicative parts of the practical skill. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: We believe that reallocating curricular time to additional hours dedicated to simulation scenarios will better prepare aspiring healthcare professionals for the demanding and dynamic nature of their career, as we continue to increase our understanding of the potential of simulation-based education.

When Life-Supporting Interventions Lead to Moral Distress.

Moral distress can impact nurses and the care team significantly. A profession dedicated to the principles of caring and compassion is often subjected to patients receiving futile treatment. With the proliferation of extreme life-prolonging measures come the difficulties in the withdrawal of those medical modalities. If a prognosis is poor and care is perceived as curative rather than palliative, providers may often feel conflicted and distressed by their interventions. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing has expressed growing concern about an increase in the use of inappropriate life-support treatments related to futile care. The compelling case of a severely beaten 69-year-old homeless man who had cardiac-arrested and was resuscitated after an unknown amount of down-time, provides the contextual framework for this report. Ethical conflicts can become very challenging, which inevitably increases the suffering of the patient and their caregivers. Research findings suggest that health care organizations can benefit from enacting processes that make ethical considerations an early and routine part of everyday clinical practice. A proactive approach to ethical conflicts may improve patient care outcomes and decrease moral distress.

[Withdrawal of life sustaining treatment in the ICU - different doctors act differently]. / Hur livsuppehållande behandling avbryts på Iva ­ läkare gör olika.

Decisions to withdraw life sustaining treatment in the ICU are common, but there is little information about how treatment should be withdrawn. A pilot study showed that doctors withdraw life sustaining treatment in different ways even in identical cases. This variation can cause stress for ICU staff and relatives.  Our study investigated the decisions of doctors working in ICUs in Sweden regarding the withdrawal of life sustaining treatment for two fictitious patients. There was variation in if and how drug treatments should be withdrawn, as well as how ventilatory support should be withdrawn. Less experienced doctors tended to choose to prolong the dying process by weaning, even if it is unclear if that is preferable for the staff or for relatives.  Our study could be used in discussions in ICUs to try to understand how individual doctors make decisions about withdrawing life sustaining treatment.