Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 27.946
Filtrar
2.
Adv Child Dev Behav ; 67: 104-131, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39260901

RESUMO

Disabled people are the largest minority group in the world. Like members of many minority groups, they face considerable prejudice and discrimination-known as ableism. Ableism reflects entrenched beliefs about what human bodies and minds should be like and a devaluation of individuals who deviate from that ideal. There is surprisingly little psychological science about ableism, and even less about its development. This chapter considers how social-cognitive biases evident in early childhood could contribute to its development. The chapter is structured around four biases: Prescriptive reasoning, promiscuous teleology, psychological essentialism, and the positivity bias. For each bias, we review foundational research about how it manifests in early childhood, speculate about its connection to ableism, and outline avenues for additional research. Understanding how social-cognitive biases contribute to the development of ableism is an important first step in efforts to equip children (and adults) with the tools to reject it.


Assuntos
Preconceito , Cognição Social , Humanos , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Grupos Minoritários , Percepção Social , Pessoas com Deficiência , Capacitismo
4.
BMC Psychol ; 12(1): 482, 2024 Sep 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39267178

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compile a scale of Chinese college students' perception of teachers' differential behavior and to provide a reference for college students to establish correct life values, promote college students' physical and mental health, and reduce teachers' differential treatment. METHODS: Open-ended questionnaires and expert interviews were used to conduct interviews and correspondence with 58 college students, ten psychologists, and six psychologists to form an initial questionnaire. Then, the scale's exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and reliability and validity test were conducted on 7053 college students from 18 universities in 6 provinces (municipalities directly under the Central Government). RESULTS: The Chinese college students' perception of teachers' differential behavior scale has two dimensions: teacher prejudice and preference. Each dimension includes three aspects: emotional feedback, behavior orientation, and opportunity privilege, and each aspect have a total of 4 items. The consistency test coefficients of each dimension and each factor of the prepared scale are all above 0.7, and the split-half reliability is above 0.6. Confirmatory factor analysis shows that the six-factor structural model fits well (χ2/df = 4.287, RMSEA = 0.066, CFI = 0.950, TLI = 0.919). Using the generalized anxiety disorder scale and the patient health questionaire-9items as empirical criteria, each factor in the scale demonstrated significant correlations with both the GAD scale and the patient health questionaire-9items. CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese college students' perception of teachers' differential behavior scale has a two-dimensional six-factor structure and has good reliability and validity. It can be used as an effective tool to measure Chinese college students' perceived teacher differential behavior.


Assuntos
Estudantes , Humanos , Estudantes/psicologia , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto Jovem , China , Universidades , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Adulto , Psicometria/instrumentação , Análise Fatorial , Adolescente , Percepção Social , Preconceito/psicologia , Docentes/psicologia
5.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308397, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39208134

RESUMO

In this registered report, we propose to stress-test existing models for predicting the ideology-prejudice association, which varies in size and direction across target groups. Previous models of this relationship use the perceived ideology, status, and choice in group membership of target groups to predict the ideology-prejudice association across target groups. These analyses show that models using only the perceived ideology of the target group are more accurate and parsimonious in predicting the ideology-prejudice association than models using perceived status, choice, and all of the characteristics in a single model. Here, we stress-test the original models by testing the models' predictive utility with new measures of explicit prejudice, a comparative operationalization of prejudice, the Implicit Association Test, and additional target groups. In Study 1, we propose to directly test the previous models using an absolute measure of prejudice that closely resembles the measure used in the original study. This will tell us if the models replicate with distinct, yet conceptually similar measures of prejudice. In Study 2, we propose to develop new ideology-prejudice models for a comparative operationalization of prejudice using both explicit measures and the Implicit Association Test. We will then test these new models using data from the Ideology 2.0 project collected by Project Implicit. We do not have full access to this data yet, but upon acceptance of our Stage 1 registered report, we will gain access to the complete dataset. Currently, we have access to an exploratory subset of the data that we use to demonstrate the feasibility of the study, but its limited number of target groups prevents conclusions from being made.


Assuntos
Preconceito , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos , Masculino , Publicação Pré-Registro
6.
Sci Adv ; 10(33): eado5957, 2024 Aug 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39141723

RESUMO

The number of health care educational institutions/organizations adopting implicit bias training is growing. Our systematic review of 77 studies (published 1 January 2003 through 21 September 2022) investigated how implicit bias training in health care is designed/delivered and whether gaps in knowledge translation compromised the reliability and validity of the training. The primary training target was race/ethnicity (49.3%); trainings commonly lack specificity on addressing implicit prejudice or stereotyping (67.5%). They involved a combination of hands-on and didactic approaches, lasting an average of 343.15 min, often delivered in a single day (53.2%). Trainings also exhibit translational gaps, diverging from current literature (10 to 67.5%), and lack internal (99.9%), face (93.5%), and external (100%) validity. Implicit bias trainings in health care are characterized by bias in methodological quality and translational gaps, potentially compromising their impacts.


Assuntos
Pessoal de Saúde , Humanos , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Preconceito , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estereotipagem
7.
Brain Behav Immun ; 122: 555-564, 2024 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39168271

RESUMO

Situational factors can increase people's vulnerability to intergroup bias, including prejudicial attitudes, negative stereotyping, and discrimination. We proposed that increases in inflammatory activity that coincide with acute illness may represent a hitherto unstudied situational factor that increases intergroup bias. The current study experimentally manipulated increases in inflammatory activity by administering the seasonal influenza vaccine or a saline placebo. We quantified inflammatory activity by assessing change in salivary pro-inflammatory cytokines and assessed intergroup bias using a resume evaluation task and self-reported ethnocentrism. Primary analyses focused on a subsample of 117 participants who provided high quality data; robustness analyses included various permutations of lower quality participants. Findings revealed that changes in the cytokine interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) in response to the vaccine were associated with greater intergroup bias. Among participants who received the vaccine, IL-1ß change was negatively associated with evaluation of a Latina (but not a White woman) applicant's competency and recommended starting salary. Moreover, IL-1ß change was positively associated with ethnocentrism. Overall, results provide support for the hypothesis that acute illness, via the mechanistic role of inflammatory cytokines, affects social cognition in ways that can increase intergroup bias.


Assuntos
Citocinas , Hispânico ou Latino , Vacinas contra Influenza , Interleucina-1beta , Humanos , Feminino , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Masculino , Adulto , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Citocinas/metabolismo , Interleucina-1beta/metabolismo , Adulto Jovem , Saliva/imunologia , Saliva/química , Candidatura a Emprego , Preconceito
8.
Acta Psychol (Amst) ; 249: 104439, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39137692

RESUMO

The Russian invasion of Ukraine led to a major humanitarian crisis resulting in many Ukrainians seeking refugee status in European countries. Unlike the positive attitudes towards Ukrainian refugees, Afghan refugees who were also required to leave their country following the Taliban's takeover of Afghanistan, received a negative reaction from the same European countries. Examining similar crises, a year apart, where people fled perilous situations in their countries, reveals contrasting reactions that emphasize the need to understand factors driving diverse public attitudes. Integrated Threat Theory (ITT), which posits that perceived threats can lead to prejudice and negative attitudes, may elucidate mechanisms behind opposing reactions towards Ukrainian and Afghan refugees. This study explores whether symbolic threats, intergroup anxiety, fear of terrorism, and political orientation are differentially related to attitudes towards Afghan and Ukrainian refugees in 250 European participants. Results demonstrate that participants hold more positive attitudes towards Ukrainian refugees compared to Afghan refugees. All the aforementioned factors predicted attitudes towards Afghan refugees, but only symbolic threats predicted attitudes towards Ukrainian refugees. Ethnicity and religiosity explain the relationship between symbolic threats and attitudes towards Afghan refugees. Western European participants show a stronger link between terrorism fear and negative views on Afghan refugees than Eastern Europeans, possibly due to higher terrorism rates in the West. Thus, attitudes towards refugees are intricate, but the study emphasizes the role of ITT, terrorism fear, politics, ethnicity, religiosity, and region. The findings could refine policies, stressing the need to address these factors for fostering inclusive, empathetic European societies.


Assuntos
Atitude , Refugiados , Humanos , Refugiados/psicologia , Ucrânia/etnologia , Afeganistão/etnologia , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Europa (Continente)/etnologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Terrorismo/psicologia , Preconceito , Ansiedade/etnologia , Ansiedade/psicologia , Política
9.
J Interpers Violence ; 39(17-18): 3855-3875, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39119650

RESUMO

Hate crime is increasingly a familiar term within the domains of scholarship, policy, and activism as the harms associated with acts of targeted hostility continue to pose complex, global challenges. However, an exclusively Western-centric focus has done little to foster transnational conversations or to shape conceptual or legal frameworks in parts of the world where the challenges posed by hate and prejudice remain underexplored despite their devastating consequences. This article considers how the complexities and specificities of the Indian context disrupt the dominant assumptions of conventional hate crime frameworks. In doing so, it highlights the value of extending conventional Westernized models of thinking to different environments with different sets of challenges. Through its analysis of caste crimes and the factors that reinforce a prevailing institutional and cultural backdrop of political indifference, bureaucratic resistance, and public skepticism, the article illustrates why and how key elements of the Western framework remain ill-suited to the Indian context. The authors call instead for a creative translation of the hate crime concept, which accommodates the nature of violence within specific social contexts, and which emphasizes the institutional features that can mitigate the limitations of state capacity and intent. The process of translation has value in harnessing the benefits of the hate crime concept within countries, which lack a common framework to foster shared understanding and prioritization in relation to tackling contemporary expressions of hate. At the same time, this process enriches prevailing thinking, dismantles stereotypes, and challenges scholars of targeted violence to familiarize themselves with the unfamiliar.


Assuntos
Crime , Ódio , Humanos , Índia , Violência , Preconceito
10.
Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract ; 54(5): 813-824, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003178

RESUMO

Implicit biases are those we are unwilling to admit, yet they influence our behavior in ways that impact our experience in the workplace. Literature demonstrates that implicit bias influences career choice and limits success within a chosen career. Discrimination in the veterinary workplace is pervasive and has a negative impact that is responsible for financial loss. It can also influence client communication, patient-care, and be inadvertently perpetuated by well-meaning community clinics. Strategies can be employed to acknowledge implicit bias and to foster behavioral change, which results in a healthier workplace and improved client and patient-care.


Assuntos
Médicos Veterinários , Medicina Veterinária , Médicos Veterinários/psicologia , Humanos , Animais , Escolha da Profissão , Preconceito , Viés
11.
Seizure ; 120: 189-193, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39029409

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The aim of this socio-legal pilot study is to gain insight into the access to justice for people with epilepsy in Finland by identifying the everyday problems experienced by them. Stigma, prejudice and their impact on the lives of people with epilepsy has been widely documented in the literature. Thus, we also wanted to explore whether there is a link between reported everyday problems and perceived prejudice. METHODS: In the first phase of the study, court cases were used to describe the everyday problems of people with epilepsy in Finland. In the second phase, descriptive statistical methods were used to analyse the survey data collected from adults with epilepsy in Finland (n = 237). RESULTS: Based on only a few existing court cases, the problems faced by people with epilepsy seem to be similar to those faced by other groups of people with disabilities. The most common problems reported by our survey respondents were related to healthcare services (73 %) and work (54 %), followed by family (25 %), mistreatment (25 %), housing (24 %) and goods and services (19 %). Both having refractory epilepsy and perceived prejudice seem to be linked with experiencing everyday problems. CONCLUSION: The results of this pilot study on the everyday problems experienced by people with epilepsy suggest that there are various gaps in their access to justice, even in a developed EU country like Finland.


Assuntos
Epilepsia , Preconceito , Humanos , Finlândia/epidemiologia , Projetos Piloto , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Epilepsia/epidemiologia , Epilepsia/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Justiça Social , Estigma Social , Idoso , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adolescente , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos
12.
Pol Merkur Lekarski ; 52(3): 304-318, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39007469

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Aim: The purpose of this study is to report on the development and initial psychometric testing of a questionnaire to investigate nurses' discrimination attitudes and beliefs towards people of dif f erent ethnic origins. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: The initial stage involved the selection of the questions of the tool after a comprehensive evaluation of the relevant international literature and the tools used in previous related studies. The reliability (forward-backward translation) of the questions was assessed, along with the content, face, and structure. To conduct the study, which was carried out from 07/2021 to 01/2022 a sample consisting of 30 and 2,034 nurses and their assistants was used for the pilot and the fi nal research, respectively. RESULTS: Results: Given that the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) threshold value of 0.89 was achieved, the sample was considered sufficient and appropriate for factor analysis. A statistically signif i cant result (p<0.001) from Bartlett's test indicated a substantial connection between the questions and conf i rmed that the data were suitable for factor analysis. Twenty statements altogether, with seven possible answers ranging from "totally disagree" to "completely agree," were included in the questionnaire. For the questions, three distinct factors - communication, difficulties, and discrimination - were shown to account for 47.1% of the variability. Reliability analyzes showed satisfactory Cronbach alpha coefficient scores for all factors, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: The current study demonstrates that the questionnaire we developed is a legitimate and trustworthy instrument for evaluating professional nurses' discriminatory attitudes and beliefs toward individuals from various ethnic backgrounds. The questionnaire can be used to help design interventions to end discrimination, guarantee equitable access to healthcare services, and provide high-quality care for individuals from diverse backgrounds. It can also be used to identify the factors that inf l uence nurses' attitudes and perceptions toward these patient populations.


Assuntos
Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Psicometria , Humanos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Feminino , Masculino , Adulto , Recursos Humanos de Enfermagem/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Preconceito , Enfermeiras e Enfermeiros/psicologia
13.
Acta Med Acad ; 53(1): 35-45, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38984698

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine whether fear and prejudice in relation to organ donation and the transplantation of organs may influence the decision to become an organ donor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected through four group interviews using open-ended questions and qualitative content analysis. Forty participants, 16 males and 24 females from seven countries, participated in the focus group interviews. RESULTS: The analysis resulted in three main categories, and nine subcategories. Fears and prejudice caused by tradition and customs, approval of organ donation by family members, perception of the body as a gift from parents, the influence of religious leaders, knowledge about the religious understanding of organ donation, influence of social ambience on respondents, knowledge of the donation process in the healthcare system, including knowing about life after eventual organ donation, were some of predictors in the decision to agree to organ donation. CONCLUSION: More education on the factors that influence organ donation, more information in schools, health institutions and through the media, as well as more research with the aim of "dispelling" fears and prejudice about organ donation would significantly improve the current situation and result in a larger number of potential organ donors.


Assuntos
Emigrantes e Imigrantes , Medo , Grupos Focais , Preconceito , Doadores de Tecidos , Obtenção de Tecidos e Órgãos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Suécia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Doadores de Tecidos/psicologia , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Tomada de Decisões , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Pesquisa Qualitativa
14.
Multimedia | Recursos Multimídia | ID: multimedia-13197

RESUMO

O tema aborda o SUS e a identificação das desigualdades raciais em saúde.


Assuntos
Racismo , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Preconceito
16.
Psychol Bull ; 150(8): 921-964, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38934917

RESUMO

Seventy years of research on intergroup contact, or face-to-face interactions between members of opposing social groups, demonstrates that positive contact typically reduces prejudice and increases social cohesion. Extant syntheses, however, have not considered the full breadth of contact valence (positive/negative) and have treated self-selection as a threat to validity. This research bridges intergroup contact theory with sequential sampling models of impression formation to assess contact effects across all valences. From the premise that positive versus negative contact instigates differential resampling of outgroup experiences when self-selection is possible, we advance and meta-analytically test new predictions for the moderation of valenced contact effects and negativity bias as a function of people's opportunity and motivation to self-select in and out of contact. Our random-effects synthesis of positive and negative intergroup contact studies (238 independent samples, 936 nested effects; total N = 152,985) found significant valenced contact effects: Positive contact systematically associates with lower prejudice, and negative contact associates with higher prejudice. Critically, the detrimental effect of negative contact is significantly larger than the benefit of positive contact. This negativity bias is particularly pronounced under conditions in which one can self-select, is motivated to avoid contact, among male-dominated and prejudiced samples, in contact with stigmatized, low status, low socioeconomic status outgroups, along nonconcealable stigma, with nonintimate contact partners in informal settings and in collectivistic societies. Considering individuals' motivation and opportunity to self-select, together with contact valence, therefore offers a more nuanced and integrated platform to design contact-based interventions and policies across varied contact ecologies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Relações Interpessoais , Motivação , Preconceito , Humanos , Preconceito/psicologia , Processos Grupais
17.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1514, 2024 Jun 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38840254

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Mandates provide a relatively cost-effective strategy to increase vaccinate rates. Since 2014, five Australian states have implemented No Jab No Play (NJPlay) policies that require children to be fully immunised to attend early childhood education and childcare services. In Western Australia, where this study was conducted, NJNPlay legislation was enacted in 2019. While most Australian families support vaccine mandates, there are a range of complexities and unintended consequences for some families. This research explores the impact on families of the NJNPlay legislation in Western Australia (WA). METHODS: This mixed-methods study used an online parent/carer survey (n = 261) representing 427 children and in-depth interviews (n = 18) to investigate: (1) the influence of the NJNPlay legislation on decision to vaccinate; and (2) the financial and emotional impacts of NJNPlay legislation. Descriptive and bivariate tests were used to analyse the survey data and open-ended questions and interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis to capture the experience and the reality of participants. RESULTS: Approximately 60% of parents intended to vaccinate their child. Parents who had decided not to vaccinate their child/ren were significantly more likely to experience financial [p < 0.001] and emotional impacts [p < 0.001], compared to those who chose to vaccinate because of the mandate. Qualitative data were divided with around half of participants supporting childhood immunisation and NJNPlay with others discussing concerns. The themes (a) belief in the importance of vaccination and ease of access, (b) individual and community protection, and (c) vaccine effectiveness, safety and alternatives help understand how parents' beliefs and access may influence vaccination uptake. Unintended impacts of NJNPlay included: (a) lack of choice, pressure and coercion to vaccinate; (b) policy and community level stigma and discrimination; (c) financial and career impacts; and (d) loss of education opportunities. CONCLUSIONS: Parents appreciation of funded immunisation programs and mandates which enhance individual and community protection was evident. However for others unintended consequences of the mandate resulted in significant social, emotional, financial and educational impacts. Long-term evidence highlights the positive impact of immunisation programs. Opinions of impacted families should be considered to alleviate mental health stressors.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Saúde da Criança , Política de Saúde , Programas de Imunização , Pais , Cobertura Vacinal , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Cuidado da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Saúde da Criança/legislação & jurisprudência , Tomada de Decisões , Educação/legislação & jurisprudência , Educação/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/economia , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Programas de Imunização/legislação & jurisprudência , Pais/psicologia , Segurança do Paciente , Preconceito , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Estigma Social , Inquéritos e Questionários , Cobertura Vacinal/legislação & jurisprudência , Vacinas/efeitos adversos , Austrália Ocidental
18.
Curr Opin Psychol ; 58: 101815, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38908348

RESUMO

Facial inference, a cornerstone of person perception, has traditionally been studied through human judgments about personality traits and abilities based on people's faces. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have introduced new dimensions to this field, employing machine learning algorithms to reveal people's character, capabilities, and social outcomes based just on their faces. This review examines recent research on human and AI-based facial inference across psychology, business, computer science, legal, and policy studies to highlight the need for scientific consensus on whether or not people's faces can reveal their inner traits, and urges researchers to address the critical concerns around epistemic validity, practical relevance, and societal welfare before recommending AI-based facial inference for consequential uses.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Personalidade , Preconceito , Percepção Social , Humanos , Reconhecimento Facial , Julgamento
19.
BMJ Open ; 14(6): e082481, 2024 Jun 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834316

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To explore and characterise the discrimination and racism experienced in healthcare from the perspective of Dutch patients with a migration background. DESIGN: This was a qualitative phenomenological study incorporating an inductive thematic analysis of the answers provided to a free form online survey. Descriptive and differential analyses were conducted for the closed-ended questions. SETTING: This study used an online survey distributed in Dutch about experiences of discrimination and racism in healthcare to the general population in the Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: The survey was completed by 188 participants (Mage=39.89, SDage=10.2). Of whom 80 (Mage=37.92, SDage=10.87) met the eligibility criteria for thematic analysis (ie, has a migration background or a relative with a migration background and experienced discrimination in healthcare based on their background) and were thus included in the analysis. RESULTS: From the total sample, women, relative to men, were 2.31 times more likely to report experiencing healthcare discrimination (OR=2.31; 95% CI 1.23 to 4.37). The majority of the participants (60.1%) had a Moroccan or Turkish background. Six themes were identified relating to experienced discrimination in healthcare based on one's migration background: (1) explicit discrimination, (2) prejudice, (3) not being taken seriously, (4) discriminatory behaviour, (5) language barriers and (6) pain attribution to cultural background. Some participants reported that their attire or religion was linked to their migration background, thus contributing to their experiences of discrimination. CONCLUSION: Dutch patients with a migration background may experience discrimination based on their ethnic identity or other factors related to their backgrounds, such as their faith, culture and skin colour. Discrimination manifests as intersectional and may take different forms (eg, discrimination based on the intersection between race and gender). Therefore, healthcare discrimination may increase health inequities and lead to unequal access to healthcare services. Implicitly or explicitly discriminating against patients is immoral, unethical, illegal and hazardous for individual and public health. Further research on the magnitude of discrimination in healthcare and its relation to health is needed.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Qualitativa , Racismo , Humanos , Racismo/psicologia , Feminino , Masculino , Países Baixos , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inquéritos e Questionários , Emigrantes e Imigrantes/psicologia , Preconceito/psicologia , Idoso , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Discriminação Social
20.
Harefuah ; 163(6): 382-386, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Hebraico | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884293

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Weight stigma, or weight bias, refers to biased beliefs and negative opinions towards people with excess weight. This phenomenon manifests in prejudice and negative attitudes towards people with obesity, including disrespectful treatment, bullying, discrimination and even abuse, and leading to long-term negative consequences on physical and mental health. The purpose of the current review was to examine the relationship between gender and manifestations of weight stigma. Studies listed in this review show that the phenomenon of weight stigma is more common and severe among women, in numerous life areas, which include education, employment, the healthcare system, social media, sports industry, and interpersonal relationships. Possible reasons for such differences include the existing discrimination against women in various areas of life, and the emphasis on external appearance and the ideal of thinness, which relates mainly to women. In light of the serious consequences of weight stigma on public health and individual well-being, efforts must be made to prevent weight stigma, including the education of the general population, changing policies of healthcare, education and media systems, and legislation to prevent weight-based discrimination.


Assuntos
Obesidade , Estigma Social , Humanos , Obesidade/psicologia , Feminino , Fatores Sexuais , Masculino , Preconceito/psicologia , Sexismo/psicologia , Peso Corporal , Preconceito de Peso/psicologia , Saúde Pública , Discriminação Social/psicologia , Relações Interpessoais
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA