Combination of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Compared With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Alone in the Treatment of Dermal Type of Melasma: A Single-Blinded Randomized Split-Face Study.

Background: Response to the current available treatments of melasma, dermal type, in particular, is usually gradual and can result in possible side effects. Aim and Objectives: In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and topical 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in comparison with monotherapy using topical 4% HQ alone in the treatment of dermal type of melasma. Materials and Methods: This is a single-blinded, randomized, split-face clinical trial on twenty female patients with dermal type of melasma. Patients were asked to apply topical 4% HQ on both sides of their face at night for 6 months. In each participant, one side of the face was randomly chosen to receive monthly intradermal injections of PRGF for 3 sessions. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed using hemi melasma area and severity index (MASI) score, physician's global assessment (PGA), and patients' global assessment (PtGA). Results: Both groups revealed significant improvement in hemi-MASI score during the treatment course. Mean percentage of improvement at the end of study was 40.38 ± 6.04% and 33.42 ± 3.23% in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PGA demonstrated excellent-to-marked improvement in melasma in 25% and 5% of patients in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PtGA showed high levels of satisfaction in 15% of patients in the combination therapy group (vs. 0% in the monotherapy group) (P = 0.05). Conclusion: Differences between the two treatment groups in terms of hemi-MASI and PGA scores were not statistically significant; however, patients demonstrated higher satisfaction with combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ compared with topical HQ alone. Thereby, combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ can be suggested as a safe alternative therapeutic approach and may hold promise in the development of future therapeutic options for dermal type of melasma.

Diagnostic Value of Dermoscopic Structures in Predicting Superficial Basal Cell Carcinoma in the Skin of Color.

Background: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) manifests different dermoscopic patterns in individuals with dark skin complexion compared to those with fair skin types. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic utility of dermoscopy in discerning superficial BCC from other types of BCC, specifically in patients with dark skin complexion. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study focuses on patients diagnosed with BCC who were referred for skin biopsy between July 2020 and September 2022. Initially, the demographic characteristics of patients, clinical attributes of lesions, and pathological sub-types of BCC were documented. Subsequently, videodermoscopy was employed to capture comprehensive views and dermoscopic images of the lesions. Univariate logistic regression analysis was then utilized to assess the reliability of dermoscopic structures in distinguishing superficial BCC from other BCC types. Last, the study evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of dermoscopy in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other BCC sub-types. Results: The study enrolled 49 patients diagnosed with BCC, with a mean age of 66.22 ± 10.41 years. The most prevalent pathological sub-type observed was nodular (53.1%). Dermoscopy exhibited a higher specificity compared to the naked eye in the differentiation of superficial BCC from other types (55% vs. 35%, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between spoke-wheel structures and superficial BCC (P = 0.02, odds ratio = 7.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.35-38.32). Conclusion: Dermoscopy exhibited superior specificity compared to the naked eye in differentiating superficial BCC from other BCC types. Notably, the spoke-wheel structure demonstrated the most robust correlation with superficial BCC.

Assessing effectiveness of adding niosomal atorvastatin 1% ointment to topical calcineurin inhibitor treatment in non-segmental vitiligo.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of vitiligo is still a big challenge for dermatologists. The efficacy of statins in the treatment of vitiligo is controversial. AIM AND OBJECTIVE: We studied possible therapeutic effect of topical 1% niosomal atorvastatin ointment combined with topical 0.1% tacrolimus in treatment of non-segmental vitiligo. METHODS: This is a triple blind, pilot, randomized placebo-controlled trial (RCT) that was performed in dermatology clinic. All the patients used topical 0.1% tacrolimus cream twice daily (BD). Moreover, the intervention group participants used topical 1% niosomal atorvastatin ointment, and control group participants were prescribed placebo ointment, BD. Patients were evaluated using vitiligo area surface index (VASI) score and patients' satisfaction at baseline and after 3 months treatment. RESULTS: The mean patient satisfaction in the intervention and control groups were 5 ± 1.4 and 3.5 ± 1.9; the difference between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.9). We found statistically significant difference in VASI score before and after treatment in both intervention and control groups (p = 0.01 and p = 0.03, respectively). However, comparison of the VASI score between groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.62). We also found no significant correlation between VASI score and other variables. CONCLUSION: The result of this study indicates that adding of niosomal atorvastatin 1% ointment to topical calcineurin inhibitor has no additional effect on non-segmental type of vitiligo. Further large studies with different combinations are recommended before any conclusive result can be concluded on efficacy of statins in vitiligo.

The role of fractional laser-assisted drug delivery in enhancing the efficacy of topical bimatoprost solution in the treatment of alopecia areata: An intra-patient comparative randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Transepidermal drug delivery is a novel therapeutic technique to boost efficacy of topical drugs. AIM: In this clinical trial we evaluate the efficacy of the combination of fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser and bimatoprost solution compared to bimatoprost alone in the treatment of alopecia areata. METHODS: This is a prospective intra-patient comparative randomized clinical trial on 20 patients with alopecia areata. In each participant two patches were chosen to randomly receive either topical 0.03% bimatoprost solution (twice a day for 12 weeks) alone or in combination with FCO2 laser (every 2 weeks for 12 weeks). Then response to treatment was evaluated by the measurement of the severity of alopecia tool score system (SALT) score, percentage of hair regrowth, physician assessment and patients' satisfaction. RESULTS: SALT score was reduced significantly during treatment sessions and after a 3-month follow-up in both treatment groups (p = 0.000). The mean percentage of improvement in SALT score in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups were 46.43 ± 4.35% and 21.16 ± 4.06% at the end of the study and 46.42 ± 5.75% and16.11 ± 3.10% at the end of the follow-up period, respectively (p = 0.000). A general linear model of two-way analysis demonstrated a significantly superior outcome in the combination therapy group compared to the monotherapy group during time (F1.6, 13.2 = 43.8. p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: Fractional ablative laser can be considered as an assistant method for enhancing of efficacy of topical drugs especially in refractory cases of patchy alopecia areata.

The innovative application of autologous biofillers in aesthetic dermatology.

INTRODUCTION: Tissue engineering is a revolutionized biotechnology that utilizes biomaterials in regenerative medicine. Nowadays, there is a trend in employing autologous-based materials in aesthetic medicine. In this review, we discuss safety and efficacy of autologous-based fillers in the fields of aesthetic dermatology, and describe the details of preparation and injection methods based on current literature. EVIDENCE ACQUSITION: PubMed, Scopus, Web of science, Embase and Google scholar were searched for studies which evaluated efficacy of autologous-based filler in the field of aesthetic dermatology from January 2000 until August 2022. Nineteen articles including five randomized clinical trials, ten prospective and four retrospective studies were selected for this review. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Most of the studies evaluated use of biofillers in rejuvenation (twelve articles) and the remaining were in atrophic scars (six articles) and striae distensae (one article). Adjuvant treatments included liquid platelet rich growth factor (PRGF), autologous cultured fibroblast, adipose tissue micrograft, microneedling, fractional carbon dioxide laser and subcision. Application of biofillers is a safe alternative therapeutic option for soft tissue augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: Application of biofillers is especially recommended in patients who seek low-cost rejuvenation methods and those with a past history of granulomatous reactions to the other fillers. It provides the advantage of immediate filling effects with long-lasting efficacy.

Employing hyaluronic acid-based mesotherapy for facial rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Mesotherapy is a method of treatment in which biocompatible substances are injected in small aliquots into different levels of skin. This technique can be used for facial rejuvenation. AIM: To comprehensively evaluate efficacy of different hyaluronic acid (HA) materials for skin rejuvenation, and discuss longevity of these products, potential adverse effects, and different injection techniques. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched Pubmed, Scopus, Web of science, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Science direct until April of 2022. Thirty-four articles were selected including 23 articles about non-cross-linked HA and 11 articles about cross-linked HA. RESULTS: Eleven and five different non-cross-linked HA and cross-linked HA materials were utilized, respectively. Treatment sessions for non-cross-linked HA were between 1 and 6 at weekly-to-bimonthly interval, and for cross-linked HA were 1-3 at 4-36 weeks apart. In most of the studies, serial micropuncture technique with 23-32 gauge needles was used for injection. Other injection techniques were Nappage (picotage), depot and micro-linear. CONCLUSION: Mesotherapy with HA-based fillers is a favorable method for restoring youthful appearance, rejuvenation, and revitalization of skin. Proper selection and precise placement of HA in desired level of dermis is an essential key to optimize improvement and minimize side effects including skin irregularities and Tyndall effect. Adjuvant therapy with additional rejuvenation procedures to enhance esthetic results is required especially in elderly individuals with severe photodamaged skin. Moreover, preservation of esthetic results requires maintenance therapy every few months.

Comparison of Pregabalin and Ketotifen in treatment of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis patients.

This study aims to compare the efficiency of Pregabalin and Ketotifen in treatment of uremic pruritus in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Thirty HD patients were randomly divided into two groups: A (Pregabalin 50 mg three times a day) and B (Ketotifen 1 mg twice a day). Efficacy of treatment and quality of life were weekly evaluated by visual analogue scale (VAS) and Itchy Quality of life, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding demographic features, laboratory data, quality of life, and VAS before treatment. In the second week of treatment, the pruritus intensity was significantly lower in the Pregabalin group than the Ketotifen group (p = 0.026). The mean of life quality was significantly lower in Ketotifen than Pregabalin group in weeks 1, 2, and 4 (p = 0.001, p = 0.001, and p = 0.036, respectively). There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the side effects of drugs. This study showed that a higher dose of Pregabalin could be a more effective treatment than Ketotifen without additive side effects in improving the quality of life in dialysis patients.

Efficacy and safety of traditional and surgical treatment modalities in segmental vitiligo: A review article.

BACKGROUND: Segmental vitiligo (SV) is a distinctive variant of vitiligo that is usually resistant to traditional treatments. Therefore, surgical therapies are mainstay of treatment in this type of vitiligo. To date, there is no review article or systematic review that evaluates specifically efficacy of treatment modalities on SV. AIM: To evaluate current evidence regarding efficacy and safety of traditional and surgical treatment modalities in SV. METHODS: We conducted a search in PubMed, Embase, Web of science, and Google Scholar for key words of "vitiligo" AND "segmental" AND "treatment" OR "therapy" OR "surgical treatments" OR "medical treatments" OR "laser" OR "phototherapy". Inclusion criteria were English literature that investigated efficacy of different treatments on three or more cases on SV from January 2000 until July 2021. RESULTS: A total of thirty-four articles were selected for detailed assessment. Different treatment modalities include medical treatment [systemic corticosteroid (SCS), topical CS (TCS), and topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI)], phototherapy [narrow band-ultraviolet B (NB-UVB), psoralen and UVA (PUVA) and psoralen+solar exposure (PUVASOL)], laser/lights [helium-neon and Excimer laser/light (EL)] and surgical treatments [punch graft (PG), follicular graft, suction blister epidermal grafting (SBEG), spilt-thickness skin graft (STSG), and cultured/non-cultured-melanocytes-keratinocytes transplantation (MKTP)]. CONCLUSION: There were few randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the efficacy of treatments in SV. Therefore, future high quality studies are required for better assessment of various treatment modalities in SV. Results of current evidence indicate resistance of SV to traditional therapies unless in patients with short duration of vitiligo. Therefore, surgical interventions are the first-line of treatment in refractory cases, long-standing disease, or presence of leukotrichia in depigmented patches.

Treatment protocols and efficacy of light and laser treatments in post-acne erythema.

BACKGROUND: Post-acne erythema is described as erythema due to release of inflammatory cytokines, dilatation of microcapillaries within papillary dermis and thinning of epidermis. The erythema usually fades; however, it can persist for months. AIM: In this review, we decided to evaluate efficacy of light and laser treatments in acne-induced erythema. METHODS: We searched PUBMED, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar for relevant key words. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that evaluated efficacy of laser or light in PAE until September 2021. RESULTS: Twelve RCTs were selected for the final assessment. Light and laser treatments included pulsed dye laser (PDL), intense pulsed light (IPL), Q-switched neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (QS Nd:YAG), fractional photothermolysis, alexandrite, solid-slate 589-1319 nm, and pro-yellow laser. CONCLUSION: Light and laser treatments are effective treatment modalities in reduction of acne-induced erythema along with active acne lesions and atrophic acne scars.

Employing microbotox technique for facial rejuvenation and face-lift.

BACKGROUND: Microbotox technique, intradermal injection of microdroplets of botulinum toxin, is a favorable rejuvenation approach in subjects who prefer more natural appearance. AIM: To determine the best injection techniques (dosage, concentration, as well as number and location of injection points), efficacy and side effects of this innovative technique for facial rejuvenation. METHODS: We conducted a search in Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases from conception until October 2021 with keywords "microbotox" OR "mesobotox" OR "intradermal injection" AND "botulinum toxin" AND "rejuvenation" AND "wrinkle" AND "face-lift." RESULTS: Twenty articles were included in this review article. Different types of formulation including onabotulinum toxin A (OBA), abobotulinum toxin A (ABO), and incobotulinum toxin A (IBA) were used. The most used concentrations were 10-20 u/cc of OBA. Number of injection points varied from 4 (forehead and periorbital areas) to 999 (entire face) with 2 mm to 2 cm apart. Adjuvant treatment modalities were cross-linked hyaluronic acid, intense pulsed laser, and Fraxel laser. Most studies reported the initial results appeared after 5-14 days of procedure, lasting for nearly 3-6 months. CONCLUSION: Microbotox is an efficient and attractive method for facial rejuvenation, mid-lower face-lifting, and fine wrinkles reduction in forehead, periocular, and cheek regions, especially in younger-aged subjects. Furthermore, it is a suitable treatment for neck rejuvenation and recontouring of lower mandibular border, particularly in older subjects with marked skin laxity.

Combination of carboxytherapy with narrowband-ultraviolet B in the treatment of recalcitrant areas of vitiligo: A randomized clinical trial.

Carboxytherapy has been used in the treatment of autoimmune skin diseases such as psoriasis and morphea. Carboxytherapy has antioxidant effects, and leads to better tissue oxygenation, and release of growth factors. In this article, we decided to evaluate efficacy of combined carboxytherapy and narrowband-ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) compared to NB-UVB alone in the treatment of vitiligo. This is a prospective, split-body double-blind comparative study performed in patients with generalized stable vitiligo in acral areas and extremities referred to dermatology clinic of Afzalipour hospital in Kerman University of Medical Sciences. NB-UVB was performed three times a week in non-consecutive days for 4 months. In each patient, one lesion was randomly treated with carboxytherapy (weekly sessions for total of 16 sessions). Efficacy of treatment was evaluated by percentage of repigmentation of the lesions. Chi-square test and analysis of variance test (ANOVA) were used to compare efficacy of treatment based on demographic features of the patients and clinical features of the lesions, respectively. Twenty-eight patients with mean age of 32.35 ± 7.37 years old completed the study. At the end of the treatment, 37% of the patients in combination therapy group demonstrated more than 75% improvement compared to 0% in the monotherapy group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference between either demographic features of the patients (age, sex, and skin phototypes) or duration of disease with efficacy of the treatment in both groups. Combination of carboxytherapy with NB-UVB leads to higher percentage of repigmentation and patients' satisfaction compared to monotherapy with NB-UVB.

Safety and efficacy of mesotherapy in the treatment of melasma: A review article.

BACKGROUND: Mesotherapy is a popular novel therapeutic modality that is defined as intradermal or subcutaneous microinjection of pharmaceutical compounds. Although this novel treatment method is used commonly in aesthetic dermatology, there is little information about details of injections, efficacy, and side effects of mesotherapy in melasma. AIM: In this review, we evaluated efficacy and safety of various types of mesotherapy in the treatment of melasma. METHOD: We searched Google Scholar, Medline, and PubMed for related articles with keywords "melasma" OR "chloasma" AND "mesotherapy" OR "injection." Inclusion criteria were articles that evaluated intradermal injection of lightening drugs and published dates between January 2000 and September 2021. Exclusion criteria were articles in languages other than English or non-human studies. RESULTS: Thirty-three articles evaluated efficacy of mesotherapy in melasma, including 28 articles about tranexamic acid, 4 articles about vitamin C, 2 articles about glutathione, and 2 articles about triamcinolone. CONCLUSION: Mesotherapy is a good alternative or adjunctive choice in patients who are refractory to first-line therapy, patients with low compliance with everyday use of topical therapy, patients with contraindication to oral tranexamic acid therapy, or who wish short downtime and fast recovery period. Further studies with large sample sizes are required to determine ideal concentrations of mesotherapy substances and intervals between sessions and to evaluate the efficacy of different substances for mesotherapy as monotherapy compared to combination therapy and other treatment modalities for melasma.

Treatment protocols and efficacy of combined laser with medical treatment modalities in vitiligo.

BACKGROUNDS: Nowadays, lasers are used for treatment of vitiligo in difficult-to-treat areas and refractory lesions. Combination of lasers with other medical modalities can provide higher efficacy, faster response rate, and higher compliance of patients to treatment. AIM: In this article, we reviewed articles regarding safety, efficacy, and treatment protocols of combined laser with other medical modalities. METHODS: We searched articles with relevant key words in Google scholar and PubMed. Inclusion criteria were articles in English language since January 2000 until March 2021that evaluate combination of laser with other topical or systemic medical treatments. RESULTS: A total of 42 articles evaluated efficacy of lasers [excimer, carbon dioxide (CO2 ), erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG), and non-ablative resurfacing laser] combined with topical or systemic medical treatment modalities. Effective response rate (more than 50% improvement) varied between 7.7% and 92%. Initial repigmentation observed between 4 and 13 weeks after beginning of treatment. CONCLUSION: Combination of laser with medical modalities leads to more rapid repigmentation, superior efficacy, and better compliance of patients with localized non-segmental type of vitiligo compared to monotherapy. Combination of excimer laser with topical therapy might be suggested for recalcitrant vitiligo lesions in face and neck. Combination of fractional ablative resurfacing lasers with topical therapy, especially 5-flurouracil, can be recommended particularly in recalcitrant acral and bony prominent areas. Further studies are required to achieve conclusive evidence in order to define the best stage of vitiligo for laser therapy and most effective combined treatment regimen.

The therapeutic role of lasers in primary localized cutaneous amyloidosis: a systematic review.

With the investigation of the efficacy of laser therapy in primary localized amyloidosis(PLCA) only recently starting to materialize, we aimed to review the currently available studies of laser therapy in the management of the disease. We searched PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, and ProQuest online databases with a specified search strategy, assessed the quality of each study, and then extracted the eligible data. Five RCTs(randomized controlled trials), one non-randomized controlled trial, three case series, and nine case reports(18 in total) were included. Overall, carbon dioxide (CO2), neodymium-doped:yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG), pulsed dye (PDL), Er (Erbium):YAG, and yttrium/erbium fiber were the studied lasers. One hundred fifty-five cases in total underwent laser therapy, with CO2 being the most frequent laser. Almost all studies demonstrated significantly desirable outcomes, while only mild and transient side effects were noted. Even though the studies' results were significant, we noticed that implementing a consistent methodology and a standardized objective assessment method was missing. Therefore, we recommend that future studies be conducted with less heterogeneous data for a more definite conclusion.

The efficacy of energy-based devices combination therapy for melasma.

Melasma is a recalcitrant pigmentary disease with a complex pathogenesis. Monotherapy often results in unsatisfactory results with high recurrence rate. In this review article, we evaluate efficacy of energy-based devices combination therapy for melasma. We reviewed published literature since 2010 up to November 2020 regarding adjuvant therapy of energy-based devices with other treatment modalities in the treatment of melasma. After final selection, we assessed 49 articles. Energy-based devices include lasers, non-coherent lights, radiofrequency, iontophoresis, sonophoresis, microneedling, and microdermabrasion. Adjuvant therapies other than energy-based devices were lightening agents, chemical peels, platelet rich plasma (PRP) and mesotherapy. Combination of Q-switched neodymium-doped: yttrium, aluminum, and garnet (QSNY) with either intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) or pulsed-dye laser (PDL) are recommended in recalcitrant melasma in patients with light skin photo types and with dilated skin vessels (especially with PDL). Combination of fractional microneedling radiofrequency or microneedling with QSNY leads to promising results and is a safe treatment modality, especially in darker skin types. Application of topical lightening agents in combination with laser therapy leads to higher efficacy with less adverse effects (post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation) and rebound of melasma. Combination of ablative techniques with QSNY is not recommended, due to the high risk of permanent adverse effects such as guttate hypopigmentation and exacerbation of melasma.

Laser therapy in cutaneous and genital warts: A review article.

Traditional treatment modalities for wart require long-term treatment course and usually have high recurrence rates and unwanted side effects. In this review article, we evaluated different types of laser therapy in the treatment of warts. Published articles since 2000 up to July 2020 about laser therapy in genital and non-genital warts were searched and assessed. Fifty articles were selected for the final review, including 22 pulsed dye laser (PDL), 10 neodymium-yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd: YAG), 3 erbium-doped yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er: YAG), 14 carbon dioxide (CO2 ) laser and one systematic review. Complete response rates were different in terms of laser type used (0%-100%, 9.1%-100%, 83.3%-100%, and 59.15%-100% for PDL, Nd: YAG, Er: YAG, and CO2 laser, respectively). There was no significant difference between conventional treatment modalities and laser therapy regarding efficacy and recurrence rate. Combination of lasers with keratolytic agents, immunomodulators and photodynamic therapy can be helpful especially in immunosuppressed patients, refractory, and recurrent lesions. PDL has the lowest occurrence of adverse effects relative to other types of lasers.

Oral manifestations of COVID-19 disease: A review article.

Dysgeusia is the first recognized oral symptom of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). In this review article, we described oral lesions of COVID-19 patients. We searched PubMed library and Google Scholar for published literature since December 2019 until September 2020. Finally, we selected 35 articles including case reports, case series and letters to editor. Oral manifestations included ulcer, erosion, bulla, vesicle, pustule, fissured or depapillated tongue, macule, papule, plaque, pigmentation, halitosis, whitish areas, hemorrhagic crust, necrosis, petechiae, swelling, erythema, and spontaneous bleeding. The most common sites of involvement in descending order were tongue (38%), labial mucosa (26%), and palate (22%). Suggested diagnoses of the lesions were aphthous stomatitis, herpetiform lesions, candidiasis, vasculitis, Kawasaki-like, EM-like, mucositis, drug eruption, necrotizing periodontal disease, angina bullosa-like, angular cheilitis, atypical Sweet syndrome, and Melkerson-Rosenthal syndrome. Oral lesions were symptomatic in 68% of the cases. Oral lesions were nearly equal in both genders (49% female and 51% male). Patients with older age and higher severity of COVID-19 disease had more widespread and sever oral lesions. Lack of oral hygiene, opportunistic infections, stress, immunosuppression, vasculitis, and hyper-inflammatory response secondary to COVID-19 are the most important predisposing factors for onset of oral lesions in COVID-19 patients.

Cutaneous and histopathological features of coronavirus disease 2019 in pediatrics: A review article.

Prevalence of dermatological manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is estimated between 0.25% and 3% in children and adolescents. In this review article, we decided to describe the cutaneous and histopathological manifestations of COVID-19 infection in pediatrics. We searched published articles in PubMed database for key words of "children" or "pediatric" and "cutaneous" or "dermatology" or "skin" and "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" or "Coronavirus disease 2019" in abstract or title from December of 2019 until September 2020. Finally, 38 articles were selected. The majority of patients were between 11 and 17 years old with predominantly male gender. Most of the patients were either asymptomatic or had a few general symptoms. The latency time from appearance of general symptoms to cutaneous ones was between 1 day and weeks. Skin lesions faded between 3 and 88 days without any sequelae, spontaneously or with either topical or systemic corticosteroids. Skin manifestations were chilblain-like (pseudochilblain), erythema multiforme-like, dactylitis, acral erythema, acute urticaria, livedo reticularis, mottling, acro-ischemia, generalized maculopapular lesions, eyelid dermatitis, miliaria-like, varicelliform lesions, and petechiae and/or purpura. Kawa-COVID-19 patients were presented more frequently with cardiogenic shock, neurological symptoms, lymphocytopenia, and thrombocytopenia as compared to classic Kawasaki's disease. Furthermore, more number of cases were resistant to the first-line treatments.

Efficacy of microneedling plus topical 4% tranexamic acid solution vs 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma: A single-blind randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: There are various treatment modalities for melasma, but none of them are effective on dermal component of melasma. AIMS: In this study, we decided to evaluate the efficacy of microneedling plus tranexamic acid in comparison with 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma. METHODS: This is a single-blind randomized clinical trial on 70 participants with 14% dropout, and therefore, 60 patients with melasma completed the study. Patients were randomized based on simple randomization in 2 groups of A (microneedling plus topical 4% tranexamic acid, monthly) and B (topical 4% hydroquinone, nightly). Evaluation of mean MASI score, patient and physician assessments was performed at 4th, 8th and12th weeks of the treatment. Statistical analysis was performed by paired t test, chi-square test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. RESULTS: Sixty women (30 patients in each group) were completed the study. Mean MASI score in group A was significantly lower at the end of the treatment (6.84 ± 4.31) than at the baseline (12.89 ± 5.16) (P < .01). Mean MASI score in group B was significantly lower at the end of the treatment (7.16 ± 4.38) than at the baseline (13.56 ± 4.88) (P < .01). There was no statistical difference between 2 groups regarding MASI score, physician and patient assessments during the treatment. Percentage of patient satisfaction was significantly higher than physician satisfaction in both treatment groups (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In our study, the combination of microneedling with tranexamic acid did not differ from 4% hydroquinone in the treatment of melasma.

Niosomal Benzoyl Peroxide and Clindamycin Lotion Versus Niosomal Clindamycin Lotion in Treatment of Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Purpose: Combination of benzoyl peroxide (BPO) with topical antibiotics can lead to higher efficacy and less bacterial resistance, but it in turn increases adverse effects such as skin irritability and dryness. In this study, the efficacy of combination therapy of niosomal BPO 1% and clindamycin (CL) 1% is compared with niosomal CL in acne vulgaris. Methods: This is a double-blind clinical trial study on 100 patients with acne vulgaris in Afzalipour hospital in Kerman. Patients were randomly divided into 2 groups (case and control). The case group received niosomal combination of BPO 1% and CL 1%.The control group received niosomal CL1%. The efficacy of treatment protocols was evaluated in 2nd, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks of treatment by counting lesions (severity and grading acne lesions) and quality of life (QoL). Furthermore, side effect were evaluated at each treatment visits. Results: The reduction in mean percentage of acne lesions in case group (treated with BPO 1% and CL1%) (64.21%) was higher than control group (treated with niosomal CL 1%) (59.04%), but the statistical difference was not significant. Sum of excellent and good results were found in 80% and 76.1% of case and control groups, respectively (P=0.377). Also adding BPO to the treatment formulation in case group did not increase adverse effects, as statistical difference between 2 groups was not significant. Conclusion: Combination of niosomal BPO 1% and CL 1% in treatment of acne vulgaris showed higher efficacy with no increase in adverse effects in comparison with niosomal CL 1%, but the statistical difference was not significant.