One year of clinical experience in postdilution hemofiltration with online reinfusion of regenerated ultrafiltrate.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Hemofiltrate reinfusion (HFR) is characterized by the use of regenerated ultrafiltrate as replacement fluid. We set up a new technique, postdilution HFR (PD-HFR), aiming at increasing purification efficiency, treatment tolerance and at reducing inflammatory states. METHODS: We performed PD-HFR in 6 uremic patients during 1 year. Dialysis efficacy, dialyzer blood loss and the behavior of cytokines were evaluated. RESULTS: No pyrogenic reactions or other adverse events were recorded. Treatment tolerance was excellent. We observed high urea extraction rates and optimal Kt/V values, high beta2-microglobulin (beta2m) extraction rates and a decrease in dialyzer blood loss; also IL-6 and TNF-alpha decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Inversion of the standard HFR configuration has allowed us to improve the removal of both urea and beta2m, and to decrease dialyzer blood loss, with an optimal tolerance. Moreover, the decrease in cytokine levels might attenuate the uremic microinflammatory state.

Adequate protein dietary restriction in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with chronic renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether a dietary protein restriction is useful for slowing the progression of chronic renal failure (CRF) in diabetic and nondiabetic patients and to analyze the possible risk of malnutrition after such a dietary regimen. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized case-control clinical trial. SETTING: Nephrology outpatients. PATIENTS AND OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 169 patients, 89 affected with CRF and chronic hypertension and 80 affected with overt diabetic nephropathy (24 suffering from type 1 and 56 from type 2 diabetes) and chronic hypertension. INTERVENTION: Diabetic patients and nondiabetic patients were randomly divided into 2 groups: 40 diabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.8 g/kg/day) and 40 were maintained on a free protein diet; similarly, 44 nondiabetic patients received a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/day) and 45 were maintained on a free protein diet. The investigation lasted 1 year. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Renal function and nutritional status. RESULTS: At the end of the study, there were no statistically significant differences in renal function between treated and nontreated diabetic patients, whereas treated nondiabetic patients showed a lower decrease in renal function compared with the nontreated group. In both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, the mean body weight and obesity index decreased significantly in treated patients compared with nontreated ones. Serum albumin and prealbumin were stable in all patients during the whole study time, and there were no other signs of malnutrition. CONCLUSION: An adequate dietary protein restriction is accepted by patients, and it is well tolerated during a 12-month follow-up. Without any sign of malnutrition, it is possible to get near the ideal body weight and to reduce the obesity index and the body mass index, which are both well-established risk factors for developing cardiovascular pathology. In nondiabetic patients only, we observed a significant slowing of the progression of renal damage.

The first human renal transplant and the first xenotransplant in Italy.

The authors describe the first human renal transplantation and the first renal xenotransplant in Italy and the atmosphere at the University of Rome where these transplants were performed. Just a few months after those events, a state law was approved which allowed kidney donation.

Severe dietary protein restriction in overt diabetic nephropathy: benefits or risks?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether restricting protein intake may delay the progression of chronic renal failure caused by overt diabetic nephropathy and also whether this increases the risk of malnutrition. DESIGN: Prospective clinical trial. SETTING: Nephrology outpatients. PATIENTS: Sixty-nine patients (32 affected by type 1 and 37 by type 2 diabetes, all treated with insulin) affected by both overt diabetic nephropathy and hypertension. INTERVENTION: The study was started once hypertension and glycemia had been under control for at least 3 months. Two groups of patients, matched for similar mean glomerular filtration rate value and nutritional status, were studied: a low-protein diet (0.6 g/kg/d) was randomly prescribed to 35 patients, whereas in the other 34 patients a free diet intake was maintained for 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Renal function and nutritional status. RESULTS: The protein intake was significantly different in the 2 groups of patients, whereas the average decline of glomerular filtration rate during the follow-up was comparable. In the low-protein diet group, serum prealbumin concentration significantly decreased after 9 months, whereas serum albumin decreased at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Severe dietary protein restriction does not seem to delay the progression of renal disease in patients with overt diabetic nephropathy, whereas it may induce malnutrition.

Failure of a reinforced triple course of hepatitis B vaccination in patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis.

Long-term immunoprophylaxis with anti-HBs immunoglobulins (HBIg) is used to prevent hepatitis B (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation for HBV-related cirrhosis. This approach is highly expensive. A recent report proposed posttransplant HBV vaccination with a reinforced schedule as an alternative strategy to allow HBIg discontinuation. We investigated the efficacy of a reinforced triple course of HBV vaccination in 17 patients transplanted for HBsAg-positive cirrhosis 2 to 7 years earlier. The first cycle consisted of 3 double intramuscular doses (40 microg) of recombinant vaccine at month 0, 1, and 2, respectively. This was followed, in nonresponders, by a second cycle of 6 intradermal 10 microg doses every 15 days. All nonresponders then received a third cycle identical to the first one. Vaccination started 4.5 months after HBIg discontinuation, and lamivudine (100 mg/day) was given throughout the study. All patients were seronegative for HBsAg and HBV-DNA (by PCR) and positive for anti-HBe, and 7 were positive for anti-HDV. After the first cycle one patient (#5, 53 years old, male) developed an anti-HBs titer of 154 IU/L, another (#12) reached a titer of 20 IU/L and the remainder had titers <10 IU/L. At month 7, patient #5 reached a titer of 687 IU/L. After the second cycle only one additional patient (#9) had a slight response (an anti-HBs titer of 37 IU/L). After the third cycle patient #9 rose to an anti-HBs titer of 280 IU/L, patient #12 dropped to 10 IU/L, and no other patient responded. In conclusion, a highly reinforced HBV vaccination program is effective only in a few patients who had liver transplants for HBV-related cirrhosis.